Literature DB >> 12201896

Development of a short form of the Quality from the Patient's Perspective (QPP) questionnaire.

Bodil Wilde Larsson1, Gerry Larsson.   

Abstract

Patients' views on the quality of care are important and it is desirable that these can be assessed using short, yet valid and reliable instruments. The aim of the work reported here was to develop and test a short version of an established questionnaire: Quality from the Patient's Perspective (QPP). Patients (n=162, 79% response rate) receiving care at medical and surgical departments in two Swedish hospitals responded to the original QPP as well as to a newly developed short version. An ethical research committee approved the study. Pearson correlations were computed between the long and short forms and differences between means were analysed with t-tests. Reliability was estimated by computing Cronbach alpha coefficients. Correlations of acceptable size were found between the short form and the original QPP. The short form also had acceptable reliability coefficients. The strengths of the work are that the items in the short version are derived from a patient perspective and are formulated in words used by patients; the items still have a theoretical foundation, which makes the interpretation of results more meaningful; global formulations such as "What do you think about your care?" have been avoided; the short format should make the questionnaire more attractive for many patients to respond to. Limitations are that results indicate that the short form does not fully measure what the long form does. Therefore, when the short form is used in practice, a two-step procedure is suggested, where a follow-up is done with a selection of items from the original long form. This selection could be restricted to areas where problems may be suspected, based on the results from the short form.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12201896     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2002.00640.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  44 in total

1.  The development and initial validation of a clinical tool for patients' preferences on patient participation--The 4Ps.

Authors:  Ann Catrine Eldh; Kristina Luhr; Margareta Ehnfors
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Structured multi-disciplinary psychosocial care for cancer patients and the perceived quality of care from the patient perspective: a cluster-randomized trial.

Authors:  Susanne Singer; Helge Danker; Jürgen Meixensberger; Susanne Briest; Andreas Dietz; Rolf-Dieter Kortmann; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Anette Kersting; Julia Roick
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Quality of care and emotional support from the inpatient cancer patient's perspective.

Authors:  S Singer; H Götze; C Möbius; H Witzigmann; R-D Kortmann; A Lehmann; M Höckel; R Schwarz; J Hauss
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  COVID-NURSE: evaluation of a fundamental nursing care protocol compared with care as usual on experience of care for noninvasively ventilated patients in hospital with the SARS-CoV-2 virus-protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  David A Richards; Holly Vr Sugg; Emma Cockcroft; Joanne Cooper; Susanne Cruickshank; Faye Doris; Claire Hulme; Phillipa Logan; Heather Iles-Smith; G J Melendez-Torres; Anne Marie Rafferty; Nigel Reed; Anne-Marie Russell; Maggie Shepherd; Sally J Singh; Jo Thompson Coon; Susannah Tooze; Stephen Wootton; Rebecca Abbott; Alison Bethel; Siobhan Creanor; Lynne Quinn; Harry Tripp; Fiona C Warren; Rebecca Whear; Jessica Bollen; Harriet A Hunt; Merryn Kent; Leila Morgan; Naomi Morley; Lidia Romanczuk
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review.

Authors:  Alexandra Sawyer; Susan Ayers; Jane Abbott; Gillian Gyte; Heike Rabe; Lelia Duley
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  The Generic Short Patient Experiences Questionnaire (GS-PEQ): identification of core items from a survey in Norway.

Authors:  Ingeborg Strømseng Sjetne; Oyvind A Bjertnaes; Rolf Vegar Olsen; Hilde Hestad Iversen; Geir Bukholm
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  The Nordic Patient Experiences Questionnaire (NORPEQ): cross-national comparison of data quality, internal consistency and validity in four Nordic countries.

Authors:  Kjersti Eeg Skudal; Andrew Malcolm Garratt; Birgitta Eriksson; Tuija Leinonen; Jan Simonsen; Oyvind Andresen Bjertnaes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  A descriptive study of Swedish women with symptoms of breast inflammation during lactation and their perceptions of the quality of care given at a breastfeeding clinic.

Authors:  Linda J Kvist; Marie Louise Hall-Lord; Bodil Wilde Larsson
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 3.461

9.  Construct Validity of the Questionnaire Quality From the Patients Perspective Adapted for Surgical Prostate Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Ola Christiansen; Jūratė Šaltytė Benth; Øyvind Kirkevold; Ola Bratt; Marit Slaaen
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2021-03-03

Review 10.  A systematic review of tests of empathy in medicine.

Authors:  Joanne M Hemmerdinger; Samuel D R Stoddart; Richard J Lilford
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.