Literature DB >> 12201587

Comparative safety and immunogenicity of two yellow fever 17D vaccines (ARILVAX and YF-VAX) in a phase III multicenter, double-blind clinical trial.

Thomas P Monath1, Richard Nichols, W Tad Archambault, Linda Moore, Ron Marchesani, Jason Tian, Robert E Shope, Nicola Thomas, Robert Schrader, Dean Furby, Philip Bedford.   

Abstract

Yellow fever (YF) is a significant health problem in South America and Africa. Travelers to these areas require immunization. The United States, infested with Aedes aegypti mosquitoes, is at risk of introduction of this disease. There is only a single U.S. manufacturer of YF 17D vaccine, and supplies may be insufficient in an emergency. A randomized, double-blind outpatient study was conducted in 1,440 healthy individuals, half of whom received the U.S. vaccine (YF-VAX) and half the vaccine manufactured in the United Kingdom (ARILVAX). A randomly selected subset of approximately 310 individuals in each treatment group was tested for YF neutralizing antibodies 30 days after vaccination. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of individuals who developed a log neutralization index (LNI) of 0.7 or higher. Seroconversion occurred in 98.6% of individuals in the ARILVAX group and 99.3% of those in the YF-VAX group. Statistically, ARILVAX was equivalent to YF-VAX (P = .001). Both vaccines elicited mean antibody responses well above the minimal level (LNI 0.7) protective against wild-type YF virus. The mean LNI in the YF-VAX group was higher (2.21) than in the ARILVAX group (2.06; P = .010) possibly because of the higher dose contained in YF-VAX. Male gender, Caucasian race, and smoking were associated with higher antibody responses. Both vaccines were well tolerated. Overall, the treatment groups were comparable with respect to safety except that individuals in the ARILVAX group experienced significantly less edema, inflammation, and pain at the injection site than those in the YF-VAX group. No serious adverse events were attributable to either vaccine. YF-VAX participants (71.9%) experienced one or more nonserious adverse events than ARILVAX individuals (65.3%; P = .008). The difference was due to a higher rate of injection site reactions in the YF-VAX group. Mild systemic reactions (headache, myalgia, malaise, asthenia) occurred in roughly 10% to 30% of participants during the first few days after vaccination, with no significant difference across treatment groups. Adverse events were less frequent in individuals with preexisting immunity to YF, indicating a relationship to virus replication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12201587     DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.2002.66.533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg        ISSN: 0002-9637            Impact factor:   2.345


  52 in total

1.  Yellow Fever Immunizations: Indications and Risks.

Authors:  Mary E. Wilson; Lin H. Chen; Elizabeth D. Barnett
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.725

2.  Yellow fever vaccine seroconversion in travelers.

Authors:  Allison Kay; Lin H Chen; Maggie Sisti; Thomas P Monath
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 3.  Feasibility of cross-protective vaccination against flaviviruses of the Japanese encephalitis serocomplex.

Authors:  Mario Lobigs; Michael S Diamond
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.217

Review 4.  Current trends in West Nile virus vaccine development.

Authors:  Ian J Amanna; Mark K Slifka
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 5.217

5.  Yellow Fever: Factors Associated with Death in a Hospital of Reference in Infectious Diseases, São Paulo, Brazil, 2018.

Authors:  Ana Freitas Ribeiro; Roberta Figueiredo Cavalin; Jamal Muhamad Abdul Hamid Suleiman; Jessica Alves da Costa; Marileide Januaria de Vasconcelos; Ceila Maria Sant'Ana Málaque; Jaques Sztajnbok
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.345

6.  Protective immunity following vaccination: how is it defined?

Authors:  Ian J Amanna; Ilhem Messaoudi; Mark K Slifka
Journal:  Hum Vaccin       Date:  2008-02-19

7.  Evaluation of sex, race, body mass index and pre-vaccination serum progesterone levels and post-vaccination serum anti-anthrax protective immunoglobulin G on injection site adverse events following anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA) in the CDC AVA human clinical trial.

Authors:  Tracy Pondo; Charles E Rose; Stacey W Martin; Wendy A Keitel; Harry L Keyserling; Janiine Babcock; Scott Parker; Robert M Jacobson; Gregory A Poland; Michael M McNeil
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Immune correlates of protection against yellow fever determined by passive immunization and challenge in the hamster model.

Authors:  Justin G Julander; Dennis W Trent; Thomas P Monath
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 9.  Factors That Influence the Immune Response to Vaccination.

Authors:  Petra Zimmermann; Nigel Curtis
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 10.  Experimental therapies for yellow fever.

Authors:  Justin G Julander
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 5.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.