Literature DB >> 12200811

Osteocalcin and myoglobin removal in on-line hemodiafiltration versus low- and high-flux hemodialysis.

Francisco Maduell1, Victor Navarro, Ma Carmen Cruz, Eduardo Torregrosa, Daniel Garcia, Victoria Simon, Jose Antonio Ferrero.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Removal of medium and large solutes is poor with low-flux (LF-HD) and limited with high-flux hemodialysis (HF-HD) and on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF). In clinical practice, there are few in vivo solute markers. Osteocalcin is a protein with a molecular mass of 5,800 daltons, and myoglobin is a large molecule with a molecular mass of 17,200 daltons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of OL-HDF on in vivo removal of a wide spectrum of solutes (urea, creatinine, osteocalcin, beta2-microglobulin, and myoglobin) in comparison to LF-HD and HF-HD.
METHODS: Twenty-three patients (15 men, 8 women) were studied. Every patient underwent three dialysis sessions with routine HD parameters. We compared 1.8-m2 polysulfone LF-HD and 1.8-m2 polysulfone HF-HD versus OL-HDF. Predialysis and postdialysis solute concentrations were measured. The percentage of reduction ratio for each solute was calculated.
RESULTS: Mean values for predialysis osteocalcin, beta2-microglobulin, and myoglobin were 16.3 +/- 21 ng/mL, 27.4 +/- 5 mg/L, and 239 +/- 162 ng/mL in LF-HD, respectively. Urea and creatinine reduction ratios were similar in LF-HD and HF-HD and only 1.2% higher in OL-HDF. Osteocalcin, beta2-microglobulin, and myoglobin reduction ratios for LF-HD were negligible. Mean osteocalcin reduction rates were 54.2% +/- 12% for HF-HD versus 63.5% +/- 9% for OL-HDF (reinfusion volume, 26.8 +/- 5 L/session; P < 0.01). Mean beta2-microglobulin reduction rates were 60.1% +/- 9% for HF-HD versus 75.4% +/- 9% for OL-HDF (P < 0.01). Mean myoglobin reduction rates were 24.5% +/- 6% and 62.7% +/- 9% for HF-HD and OL-HDF, respectively (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: LF-HD does not seem to remove solutes with a molecular weight greater than 5,800 daltons. OL-HDF provides marked enhancement of convection volume and enables a significant increase in osteocalcin and beta2-microglobulin removal. Myoglobin extraction is nil with LF-HD, very low with HF-HD, and only adequate with OL-HDF. Copyright 2002 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12200811     DOI: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.34918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  14 in total

1.  Hemodiafiltration to Address Unmet Medical Needs ESKD Patients.

Authors:  Bernard Canaud; Jörg Vienken; Stephen Ash; Richard A Ward
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 2.  Home haemodialysis and uraemic toxin removal: does a happy marriage exist?

Authors:  Raymond Vanholder; Sunny Eloot; Nathalie Neirynck; Wim Van Biesen
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 3.  An update on uremic toxins.

Authors:  N Neirynck; R Vanholder; E Schepers; S Eloot; A Pletinck; G Glorieux
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Performance and Hemocompatibility of a Novel Polysulfone Dialyzer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Götz Ehlerding; Ansgar Erlenkötter; Adelheid Gauly; Bettina Griesshaber; James Kennedy; Lena Rauber; Wolfgang Ries; Hans Schmidt-Gürtler; Manuela Stauss-Grabo; Stephan Wagner; Adam M Zawada; Sebastian Zschätzsch; Manuela Kempkes-Koch
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2021-04-07

5.  The incremental treatment of ESRD: a low-protein diet combined with weekly hemodialysis may be beneficial for selected patients.

Authors:  Stefania Caria; Adamasco Cupisti; Giovanna Sau; Piergiorgio Bolasco
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.388

6.  Determination of Etelcalcetide Biotransformation and Hemodialysis Kinetics to Guide the Timing of Its Dosing.

Authors:  Katheryne Z Edson; Benjamin M Wu; Abhinaya Iyer; William Goodman; Gary L Skiles; Raju Subramanian
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2016-04-21

Review 7.  Biochemical and Clinical Impact of Organic Uremic Retention Solutes: A Comprehensive Update.

Authors:  Raymond Vanholder; Anneleen Pletinck; Eva Schepers; Griet Glorieux
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 4.546

8.  Effects of high-volume online mixed-hemodiafiltration on anemia management in dialysis patients.

Authors:  Luciano A Pedrini; Adam M Zawada; Anke C Winter; Jenny Pham; Gudrun Klein; Melanie Wolf; Astrid Feuersenger; Pio Ruggiero; Annalisa Feliciani; Carlo Barbieri; Adelheid Gauly; Bernard Canaud; Stefano Stuard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Monitoring of hemodialysis quality-of-care indicators: why is it important?

Authors:  Steven Grangé; Mélanie Hanoy; Frank Le Roy; Dominique Guerrot; Michel Godin
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 10.  Clinical evidence on haemodiafiltration.

Authors:  Peter J Blankestijn; Muriel P Grooteman; Menso J Nube; Michiel L Bots
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.