Literature DB >> 12200596

Impact of microsatellite testing and mismatch repair protein expression on the clinical interpretation of genetic testing in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer.

Robyn Ward1, Cliff Meldrum, Rachael Williams, Elisa Mokany, Rodney Scott, Jenny Turner, Nicholas Hawkins, Bronwyn Burgess, Claire Groombridge, Allan Spigelman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Identification of germline mutations in mismatch repair genes is increasingly being used to guide clinical practice in hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer. The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the clinical utility of immunostaining and microsatellite instability testing in a group of individuals in whom germline testing of hMSH2 and hMLH1 had already been performed.
METHODS: Individuals were identified from the records of family cancer clinics. A total of thirty-eight tumour blocks were retrieved from 28 kindreds. DNA was extracted and PCR amplification of six microsatellite markers was performed. Immunostaining was used to examine the expression of hMSH2 and hMLH1 protein.
RESULTS: Of the 32 assessable tumours, 24 (75%) showed microsatellite instability. Most of the MSI-H cancers (92%) failed to express either hMLH1 or hMSH2. Deleterious germline mutations were identified in the proband in 12 of 28 families. Missense mutations were identified in 11 cases and no mutations in six probands.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of germline genetic testing is indicated for a highly selected group of individuals. MSI testing and immunostaining are extremely useful tools which significantly improve the clinical interpretation of germline results. Ambiguity regarding the significance of missense mutations in hereditary bowel cancer suggests that these findings should be interpreted with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12200596     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-002-0361-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  7 in total

1.  Functional interrogation of Lynch syndrome-associated MSH2 missense variants via CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing in human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Abhijit Rath; Akriti Mishra; Victoria Duque Ferreira; Chaoran Hu; Gregory Omerza; Kevin Kelly; Andrew Hesse; Honey V Reddi; James P Grady; Christopher D Heinen
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 2.  Microsatellite instability in gastrointestinal tract cancers: a brief update.

Authors:  Shinya Oda; Yan Zhao; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  The germline MLH1 K618A variant and susceptibility to Lynch syndrome-associated tumors.

Authors:  Fabiola Medeiros; Noralane M Lindor; Fergus J Couch; W Edward Highsmith
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  Non-truncating hMLH1 variants identified in Slovenian gastric cancer patients are not associated with Lynch Syndrome: a functional analysis report.

Authors:  Matjaz Vogelsang; Radovan Komel
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis screen to identify pathogenic Lynch syndrome-associated MSH2 DNA mismatch repair gene variants.

Authors:  Hellen Houlleberghs; Marleen Dekker; Hildo Lantermans; Roos Kleinendorst; Hendrikus Jan Dubbink; Robert M W Hofstra; Senno Verhoef; Hein Te Riele
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Human mismatch repair protein hMutLα is required to repair short slipped-DNAs of trinucleotide repeats.

Authors:  Gagan B Panigrahi; Meghan M Slean; Jodie P Simard; Christopher E Pearson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Assessing pathogenicity of MLH1 variants by co-expression of human MLH1 and PMS2 genes in yeast.

Authors:  Matjaz Vogelsang; Aleksandra Comino; Neja Zupanec; Petra Hudler; Radovan Komel
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 4.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.