Literature DB >> 16341479

Microsatellite instability in gastrointestinal tract cancers: a brief update.

Shinya Oda1, Yan Zhao, Yoshihiko Maehara.   

Abstract

Microsatellite instability (MSI) was initially reported in colorectal cancer and, particularly, in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Since mutations in the genes functioning in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) were found in HNPCC kindred, this phenotype has been connected to a deficiency in MMR. The MSI(+) phenotype is associated with various human malignancies. As MSI(+) tumors appear to form a unique clinicopathological and molecular entity that is clearly distinct from that of classical colorectal tumors, which are accompanied by chromosomal instability (CIN), an exclusive pathway of tumorigenesis has been proposed in colorectal cancer. However, this scheme, comprising two mutually exclusive pathways, is now being reexamined, in light of a series of evidence accumulating in the literature, which relates to (a) distinction between high-level MSI (MSI-H) and low-level MSI (MSI-L), (b) heterogeneity in MSI-H, particularly in the sporadic and hereditary settings, (c) molecular mechanisms underlying the MSI(+) phenotypes, and (d) relationships between the MSI(+) and CIN phenotypes. Several molecular mechanisms may underlie repeat instability in eukaryotic cells. The relationship between MSI and defective MMR may be more complicated than has been suspected. The role of MMR deficiency in tumorigenesis in the digestive tract appears to be diverse and is not simple, even in the colorectum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16341479     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-005-3125-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  118 in total

1.  Mismatch repair and microsatellite instability in esophageal cancer cells.

Authors:  N Uchida; H Kumimoto; K Nishizawa; S Tokumasu; H Harada; Y Shimada; K Ishizaki
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Correspondence re: P. Laiho et al., Low-level microsatellite instability in most colorectal carcinomas. Cancer Res., 62: 1166-1170, 2002.

Authors:  Jeremy R Jass; Vicki L J Whitehall; Joanne Young; Barbara Leggett; Stephen J Meltzer; Nagahide Matsubara; Richard Fishel
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Microsatellite Instability and hMLH1 and hMSH2 expression analysis in familial and sporadic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  S Salahshor; K Koelble; C Rubio; A Lindblom
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.662

Review 4.  A mutator phenotype in cancer.

Authors:  L A Loeb
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  The frequency of hereditary defective mismatch repair in a prospective series of unselected colorectal carcinomas.

Authors:  J M Cunningham; C Y Kim; E R Christensen; D J Tester; Y Parc; L J Burgart; K C Halling; S K McDonnell; D J Schaid; C Walsh Vockley; V Kubly; H Nelson; V V Michels; S N Thibodeau
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-08-24       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Frequency of microsatellite instability inBreast cancer determined by high-resolution fluorescent microsatellite analysis.

Authors:  E Tokunaga; E Oki; S Oda; A Kataoka; K Kitamura; S Ohno; Y Maehara; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.935

7.  Somatic frameshift mutations in the BAX gene in colon cancers of the microsatellite mutator phenotype.

Authors:  N Rampino; H Yamamoto; Y Ionov; Y Li; H Sawai; J C Reed; M Perucho
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-02-14       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  E-cadherin germline mutations in familial gastric cancer.

Authors:  P Guilford; J Hopkins; J Harraway; M McLeod; N McLeod; P Harawira; H Taite; R Scoular; A Miller; A E Reeve
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-03-26       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Microsatellite instability as a tool for the classification of gastric cancer.

Authors:  A J Simpson; O L Caballero; S D Pena
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 11.951

10.  Evaluation of microsatellite instability and immunohistochemistry for the prediction of germ-line MSH2 and MLH1 mutations in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer families.

Authors:  Siobhan S Wahlberg; James Schmeits; George Thomas; Massimo Loda; Judy Garber; Sapna Syngal; Richard D Kolodner; Edward Fox
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparative features of colorectal and gastric cancers with microsatellite instability in Chinese patients.

Authors:  Yan-qin Huang; Ying Yuan; Wei-ting Ge; Han-guang Hu; Su-zhan Zhang; Shu Zheng
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Discovery of EST-SSRs in lung cancer: tagged ESTs with SSRs lead to differential amino acid and protein expression patterns in cancerous tissues.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Bakhtiarizadeh; Mansour Ebrahimi; Esmaeil Ebrahimie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Emerging molecular classifications and therapeutic implications for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Tao Chen; Xiao-Yue Xu; Ping-Hong Zhou
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2016-05-27

Review 4.  Diagnostic, Predictive, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Molecular Biomarkers in Third Millennium: A Breakthrough in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Nicola Carlomagno; Paola Incollingo; Vincenzo Tammaro; Gaia Peluso; Niccolò Rupealta; Gaetano Chiacchio; Maria Laura Sandoval Sotelo; Gianluca Minieri; Antonio Pisani; Eleonora Riccio; Massimo Sabbatini; Umberto Marcello Bracale; Armando Calogero; Concetta Anna Dodaro; Michele Santangelo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Microsatellite Instability Analysis (MSA) for Bladder Cancer: Past History and Future Directions.

Authors:  Chulso Moon; Maxie Gordon; David Moon; Thomas Reynolds
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  DNA methylation profiling of ovarian carcinomas and their in vitro models identifies HOXA9, HOXB5, SCGB3A1, and CRABP1 as novel targets.

Authors:  Qinghua Wu; Ragnhild A Lothe; Terje Ahlquist; Ilvars Silins; Claes G Tropé; Francesca Micci; Jahn M Nesland; Zhenhe Suo; Guro E Lind
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 27.401

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.