Literature DB >> 12200551

High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation for very-low-birth-weight infants.

Sherry E Courtney1, David J Durand, Jeanette M Asselin, Mark L Hudak, Judy L Aschner, Craig T Shoemaker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of early high-frequency oscillatory ventilation as compared with conventional synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation for the treatment of infants with very low birth weight have not been established.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized, multicenter clinical trial to determine whether infants treated with early high-frequency oscillatory ventilation were more likely than infants treated with synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation to be alive without requiring supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks of postmenstrual age. Eligible infants weighed 601 to 1200 g at birth, were less than four hours of age, had received one dose of surfactant, and required ventilation with a mean airway pressure of at least 6 cm of water and a fraction of inspired oxygen of at least 0.25. Infants were stratified according to birth weight and exposure to prenatal corticosteroids and then randomly assigned to high-frequency oscillatory ventilation or synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation. Ventilation was managed according to protocols designed to optimize lung inflation and blood gas values.
RESULTS: Five hundred infants were enrolled in the study. Infants randomly assigned to high-frequency oscillatory ventilation were successfully extubated earlier than infants assigned to synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (P<0.001). Of infants assigned to high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, 56 percent were alive without a need for supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks of postmenstrual age, as compared with 47 percent of those receiving synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (P=0.046). There was no difference between the groups in the risk of intracranial hemorrhage, cystic periventricular leukomalacia, or other complications.
CONCLUSIONS: There was a small but significant benefit of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in terms of the pulmonary outcome for very-low-birth-weight infants without an increase in the occurrence of other complications of premature birth. Copyright 2002 Massachusetts Medical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12200551     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa012750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  66 in total

Review 1.  Minimising ventilator induced lung injury in preterm infants.

Authors:  S M Donn; S K Sinha
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Is high frequency oscillation the best lung protective ventilatory approach for ARDS?

Authors:  Robert M Kacmarek
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-08-16       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Diagnostic markers of infection in neonates.

Authors:  P C Ng
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Standardized lung recruitment during high frequency and conventional ventilation: similar pathophysiologic and inflammatory responses in an animal model of respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Ramesh K M Krishnan; Pat A Meyers; Cathy Worwa; Ronald Goertz; Galen Schauer; Mark C Mammel
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-02       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Surfactant use based on the oxygenation response to lung recruitment during HFOV in VLBW infants.

Authors:  Pierre Tissières; Patrick Myers; Maurice Beghetti; Michel Berner; Peter C Rimensberger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  High frequency oscillatory ventilation: is equivalence with conventional mechanical ventilation enough?

Authors:  E C Eichenwald
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 7.  Pathogenesis and treatment of bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Authors:  Jason Gien; John P Kinsella
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.856

8.  Factors effecting adoption of new neonatal and pediatric respiratory technologies.

Authors:  Thomas E Bachman; Norton E Marks; Peter C Rimensberger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Revisiting high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in vitro and in silico in neonatal conductive airways.

Authors:  Katrin Bauer; Eliram Nof; Josué Sznitman
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 10.  Current perspectives on the prevention and management of chronic lung disease in preterm infants.

Authors:  Prakesh S Shah
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.022

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.