Literature DB >> 12199661

A qualitative exploration of treatment decision-making role preference in adult asthma patients.

Ann-Louise Caress1, Karen Luker, Ashley Woodcock, Kinta Beaver.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore preferred treatment decision-making roles, and rationales for role preference, and to identify perceived facilitators to and barriers from attaining preferred role.
DESIGN: Qualitative design. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: One secondary care and four primary care sites in North-west England. Purposive sample of 32 adult asthma patients with varied socio-economic backgrounds and disease severity.
METHODS: Tape-recorded focused-conversation style interviews. Interview topic guide derived from the literature. Sort cards employed to provide the focus for exploration of role preferences.
RESULTS: Active (n = 7), collaborative (n = 11) and passive (n = 14) decisional role preferences were identified. Respondents cited level of knowledge; trust; duration of condition; severity of condition at the decisional juncture; lifelong nature of asthma; a perception that 'it is my body'; characteristics of the individual and their response to health professionals as influencing role preference. Perceived facilitators and barriers to participation included condition-related knowledge, practical issues (e.g. lack of time during consultation) and clinicians' interpersonal skills.
CONCLUSIONS: Most respondents wished to contribute to or feel involved in treatment decision-making, but not necessarily to control it. Some hindrances to participation would be amenable to intervention. The quality of the provider-patient relationship is central to facilitating participation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12199661      PMCID: PMC5060151          DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00181.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  30 in total

1.  Designing trials of interventions to change professional practice in primary care: lessons from an exploratory study of two change strategies.

Authors:  S Rogers; C Humphrey; I Nazareth; S Lister; Z Tomlin; A Haines
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-10

2.  The research needs of primary care.

Authors:  P Thomas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-01

Review 3.  Four models of the physician-patient relationship.

Authors:  E J Emanuel; L L Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992 Apr 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Patients' priorities.

Authors:  T Richards
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-01-30

5.  Self-management, autonomy, and quality of life in asthma. Population Medicine Group 91C.

Authors:  P G Gibson; P I Talbot; R C Toneguzzi
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Asthma: guided self management.

Authors:  M R Partridge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-02-26

Review 7.  Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making.

Authors:  A Coulter
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1997-04

8.  Patient empowerment in the United States: a critical commentary.

Authors:  Kathleen Johnston Roberts
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Involving patients in decisions regarding preventive health interventions using the analytic hierarchy process.

Authors:  James G. Dolan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Treatment decision making in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer.

Authors:  K Beaver; K A Luker; R G Owens; S J Leinster; L F Degner; J A Sloan
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.592

View more
  9 in total

1.  Do people want to be autonomous patients? Preferred roles in treatment decision-making in several patient populations.

Authors:  Raisa B Deber; Nancy Kraetschmer; Sara Urowitz; Natasha Sharpe
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Views of treatment decision making from adolescents with chronic illnesses and their parents: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jennifer M Knopf; Richard W Hornung; Gail B Slap; Robert F DeVellis; Maria T Britto
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Qualitative approaches to understanding patient preferences.

Authors:  Rachael Gooberman-Hill
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  How does trust affect patient preferences for participation in decision-making?

Authors:  Nancy Kraetschmer; Natasha Sharpe; Sara Urowitz; Raisa B Deber
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Assessing asthma control in UK primary care: use of routinely collected prospective observational consultation data to determine appropriateness of a variety of control assessment models.

Authors:  Gaylor Hoskins; Brian Williams; Cathy Jackson; Paul D Norman; Peter T Donnan
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  An exploration of the choices of patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Sinead Keeney; Hugh McKenna
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.711

7.  Involvement in treatment decisions: what do adults with asthma want and what do they get? Results of a cross sectional survey.

Authors:  A-L Caress; K Beaver; K Luker; M Campbell; A Woodcock
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  Inhaler Technique in Asthma: How Does It Relate to Patients' Preferences and Attitudes Toward Their Inhalers?

Authors:  Lia Jahedi; Sue R Downie; Bandana Saini; Hak-Kim Chan; Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 2.849

Review 9.  People's Experience of Shared Decision Making in Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.

Authors:  Jessica Grenfell; Andrew Soundy
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.