Literature DB >> 12199545

The measurement of vision disability.

Robert W Massof1.   

Abstract

The American Medical Association's (AMA) visual efficiency scale, a vision disability metric based on visual impairment measurements, was adopted in 1925. That scale was based on a 30-year history of theoretical models in vision economics, a misinterpretation of Snellen notation for visual acuity, and an erroneous application of Weber's psychophysical law. The AMA visual efficiency scale survived uncontested for 75 years. In 2001, the AMA adopted a new vision disability scale based on logarithmic transformations of visual acuity and visual field diameter. Like the earlier visual efficiency scale, the new scale is theoretical-it is not supported by any data that speak to the relationship between vision disability and visual impairments. Attempts to measure vision disability date to the early 1980s with the development of self-assessment visual function rating scale questionnaires. Nearly all of the questionnaires developed over the last 20 years use Likert scales, but use them incorrectly. The development of a vision disability metric based on Likert scaling parallels the historical development of other forms of measurement. A tutorial review of psychometrics-classical test theory, item response theory, and Rasch analysis-shows how vision disability measurement scales can be estimated from Likert-type visual function rating scales. We conclude that preliminary data relating measures of vision disability to measures of visual acuity and visual fields support the new AMA vision disability scale.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12199545     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200208000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  29 in total

1.  Quality of life following surgery for congenital glaucoma: findings of the LVPEI congenital glaucoma registry.

Authors:  Vijaya K Gothwal; Bharani Seelam; Anil K Mandal
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  Rating scales for neurologists.

Authors:  J Hobart
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Rasch analysis of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI).

Authors:  Bradley E Dougherty; Jason J Nichols; Kelly K Nichols
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Baseline traits of low vision patients served by private outpatient clinical centers in the United States.

Authors:  Judith E Goldstein; Robert W Massof; James T Deremeik; Sonya Braudway; Mary Lou Jackson; K Bradley Kehler; Susan A Primo; Janet S Sunness
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08

5.  Measurement of Perceived Stress in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Bradley E Dougherty; San-San L Cooley; Frederick H Davidorf
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Interpretation of low-vision rehabilitation outcome measures.

Authors:  Robert W Massof; Joan A Stelmack
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Reading ability and reading engagement in older adults with glaucoma.

Authors:  Angeline M Nguyen; Suzanne W van Landingham; Robert W Massof; Gary S Rubin; Pradeep Y Ramulu
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers.

Authors:  Judith H Hibbard; Jean Stockard; Eldon R Mahoney; Martin Tusler
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  An update on retinal prostheses.

Authors:  Lauren N Ayton; Nick Barnes; Gislin Dagnelie; Takashi Fujikado; Georges Goetz; Ralf Hornig; Bryan W Jones; Mahiul M K Muqit; Daniel L Rathbun; Katarina Stingl; James D Weiland; Matthew A Petoe
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  The Argus II epiretinal prosthesis system allows letter and word reading and long-term function in patients with profound vision loss.

Authors:  Lyndon da Cruz; Brian F Coley; Jessy Dorn; Francesco Merlini; Eugene Filley; Punita Christopher; Fred K Chen; Varalakshmi Wuyyuru; Jose Sahel; Paulo Stanga; Mark Humayun; Robert J Greenberg; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.