Literature DB >> 12199398

Coarticulation and formant transition rate in young children who stutter.

Soo-Eun Chang1, Ralph N Ohde, Edward G Conture.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess anticipatory coarticulation and second formant (F2) transition rate (FTR) of speech production in young children who stutter (CWS) and who do not stutter (CWNS). Fourteen CWS and 14 age- and gender-matched CWNS in three age groups (3-, 4-, and 5-year-olds) participated in a picture-naming task that elicited single-word utterances. The initial consonant-vowel (CV) syllables of these utterances, comprising either bilabial [b m] or alveolar [d n s z] consonants and a number of vowels [i I e epsilon ae u o c aI av],were used for acoustic analysis. To assess coarticulation and speech movement velocity, the F2 onset frequency and F2 vowel target frequency (for coarticulation) and FTR (for speech movement velocity) were computed for each CV syllable and for each participant. Based on these measures, locus equation statistics of slope, y-intercept, and standard error of estimate as well as the FTR were analyzed. Findings revealed a significant main effect for place of articulation and a significantly larger difference in FTR between the two places of articulation for CWNS than for CWS. Findings suggest that the organization of the FTR production for place of articulation may not be as contrastive or refined in CWS as in CWNS, a subtle difficulty in the speed of speech-language production, which may contribute to the disruption of their speech fluency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12199398     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/054)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  9 in total

1.  Phonetically governed voicing onset and offset in preschool children who stutter.

Authors:  Richard M Arenas; Patricia M Zebrowski; Jerald B Moon
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 2.538

2.  Anticipatory coarticulation and stability of speech in typically fluent speakers and people who stutter.

Authors:  Stefan A Frisch; Nathan Maxfield; Alissa Belmont
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 1.346

3.  Behavioral and neural correlates of speech motor sequence learning in stuttering and neurotypical speakers: an fMRI investigation.

Authors:  Matthew Masapollo; Jennifer A Segawa; Deryk S Beal; Jason A Tourville; Alfonso Nieto-Castañón; Matthias Heyne; Saul A Frankford; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Neurobiol Lang (Camb)       Date:  2021-02

4.  Spectral Coefficient Analyses of Word-Initial Stop Consonant Productions Suggest Similar Anticipatory Coarticulation for Stuttering and Nonstuttering Adults.

Authors:  Santosh Maruthy; Yongqiang Feng; Ludo Max
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 1.500

5.  Overreliance on auditory feedback may lead to sound/syllable repetitions: simulations of stuttering and fluency-inducing conditions with a neural model of speech production.

Authors:  Oren Civier; Stephen M Tasko; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 2.538

6.  The Effects of Syntactic Complexity and Sentence Length on the Speech Motor Control of School-Age Children Who Stutter.

Authors:  Evan R Usler; Bridget Walsh
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Speaking rate effects on locus equation slope.

Authors:  Jeff Berry; Gary Weismer
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2013-11

8.  Sentence-structure priming in young children who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Julie D Anderson; Edward G Conture
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Speech motor planning and execution deficits in early childhood stuttering.

Authors:  Bridget Walsh; Kathleen Marie Mettel; Anne Smith
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 4.025

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.