Literature DB >> 12199308

Fictional narratives change beliefs: replications of Prentice, Gerrig, and Bailis (1997) with mixed corroboration.

S C Wheeler, M C Green, T C Brock.   

Abstract

We report three exact replications of experiments aimed at iluminating how fictional narratives influence beliefs (Prentice, Gerrig, & Bailis, 1997). Students read fictional stories that contained weak, unsupported assertions and which took place either at their home school or at an away school. Prentice et al. found that students were influenced to accept the assertions, even those blatantly false, but that this effect on beliefs was limited to the away-school setting. We questioned the limiting of the narrative effect to remote settings. Our studies consistently reproduced the first finding, heightened acceptance of statements occurring in the conversations of narrative protagonists, but we failed to reproduce the moderating effect of school location. In an attempt to understand these discrepancies, we measured likely moderating factors such as readers' need for cognition and their extent of scrutiny of the narratives.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 12199308     DOI: 10.3758/bf03210821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  1 in total

1.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition.

Authors:  J T Cacioppo; R E Petty; C F Kao
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  1984-06
  1 in total
  11 in total

1.  Learning errors from fiction: difficulties in reducing reliance on fictional stories.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Marsh; Lisa K Fazio
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-07

Review 2.  Message design strategies to raise public awareness of social determinants of health and population health disparities.

Authors:  Jeff Niederdeppe; Q Lisa Bu; Porismita Borah; David A Kindig; Stephanie A Robert
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Ironic effects of drawing attention to story errors.

Authors:  Andrea N Eslick; Lisa K Fazio; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2011-02-02

4.  Architectural Narrative Shapes Brain Activities Underlying Approach-Avoidance Response: A Case Study of the Stadium.

Authors:  Weixia Zhang; Hongyang Wei; Xiaowen Chen; Yuyang Hou; Yujie Zhang; Qian Huang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 5.152

5.  How do readers handle incorrect information during reading?

Authors:  David N Rapp
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04

6.  Pilgrims sailing the Titanic: plausibility effects on memory for misinformation.

Authors:  Scott R Hinze; Daniel G Slaten; William S Horton; Ryan Jenkins; David N Rapp
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-02

7.  Argument Strength and the Persuasiveness of Stories.

Authors:  Constanze Schreiner; Markus Appel; Maj-Britt Isberner; Tobias Richter
Journal:  Discourse Process       Date:  2017-01-23

8.  How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation.

Authors:  P Matthijs Bal; Martijn Veltkamp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Reducing reliance on inaccurate information.

Authors:  David N Rapp; Scott R Hinze; Kristine Kohlhepp; Rachel A Ryskin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-01

10.  Recent study, but not retrieval, of knowledge protects against learning errors.

Authors:  Hillary G Mullet; Sharda Umanath; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.