Literature DB >> 12199219

Asymmetries of comparison.

C M Aguilar1, D L Medin.   

Abstract

Tversky's (1977) seminal work on directionality injudgments of similarity demonstrated that people may not judge the similarity of A to B to be equal to the similarity of B to A. In a series of studies, we investigated comparison asymmetries. In Experiment 1, our aim was to extend Tversky's findings to a heterogeneous stimulus set, but no reliable asymmetries were observed. Experiment 2 employed a variety of comparison judgments, and, although some of these measures showed asymmetries, we still failed to observe asymmetries in rated similarity. A final attempt to obtain asymmetries used direction as a within-subjects factor, and for the first time, rating asymmetries were observed. Our data reinforce the idea of comparison asymmetries but suggest that similarity rating asymmetries are only observed under quite circumscribed conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 12199219     DOI: 10.3758/bf03212338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  1 in total

1.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science.

Authors:  R N Shepard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-09-11       Impact factor: 47.728

  1 in total
  3 in total

1.  Category-based induction: an effect of conclusion typicality.

Authors:  James A Hampton; Iben Cannon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-03

2.  Predicting judged similarity of natural categories from their neural representations.

Authors:  Matthew Weber; Sharon L Thompson-Schill; Daniel Osherson; James Haxby; Lawrence Parsons
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Category-based induction from similarity of neural activation.

Authors:  Matthew J Weber; Daniel Osherson
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.526

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.