Literature DB >> 12198107

Impact of differential item functioning on age and gender differences in functional disability.

John A Fleishman1, William D Spector, Barbara M Altman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Estimates of group differences in functional disability may be biased if items exhibit differential item functioning (DIF). For a given item, DIF exists if persons in different groups do not have the same probability of responding, given their level of disability. This study examines the extent to which DIF affects estimates of age and gender group differences in disability severity among adults with some functional disability.
METHODS: Data came from the 1994/1995 National Health Interview Survey Disability Supplement. Analyses focused on 5,750 adult respondents who received help or supervision with at least one of 11 activities of daily living/instrumental activities of daily living tasks. We estimated gender and age group (18-39, 40-69, and 70+) differences in disability, using multiple-indicator/multiple-cause models, which treat functional disability as a latent trait.
RESULTS: Nine items manifested significant DIF by age or gender; DIF was especially large for "shopping" and "money management." Without adjusting for DIF, middle-aged persons were less disabled than elderly men, and women were less disabled than men among nonelderly persons. After adjusting for DIF, middle-aged persons did not differ from elderly persons, and gender differences within age groups were not significant. DISCUSSION: Comparisons of disability across sociodemographic groups need to take DIF into account. Future research should examine the causes of DIF and develop alternative question wordings that reduce DIF effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12198107     DOI: 10.1093/geronb/57.5.s275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci        ISSN: 1079-5014            Impact factor:   4.077


  34 in total

1.  Measurement equivalence in ADL and IADL difficulty across international surveys of aging: findings from the HRS, SHARE, and ELSA.

Authors:  Kitty S Chan; Judith D Kasper; Jason Brandt; Liliana E Pezzin
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Occurrences and sources of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) in patient-reported outcome measures: Description of DIF methods, and review of measures of depression, quality of life and general health.

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; Mildred Ramirez; Jin-Shei Lai; Stephanie Silver
Journal:  Psychol Sci Q       Date:  2008

Review 3.  Measurement issues in health disparities research.

Authors:  Mildred Ramírez; Marvella E Ford; Anita L Stewart; Jeanne A Teresi
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Rapid detection of differential item functioning in assessments of health-related quality of life: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Paul K Crane; Laura E Gibbons; Kaavya Narasimhalu; Jin-Shei Lai; David Cella
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Differential item functioning and health assessment.

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; John A Fleishman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Gendered Expectations Distort Male-Female Differences in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living in Later Adulthood.

Authors:  Connor M Sheehan; Elliot M Tucker-Drob
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 4.077

7.  Hierarchical nature of activities of daily living in the Spanish Disability Survey.

Authors:  M J Forjaz; A Ayala; A Abellán
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.631

8.  Exploring the Test of Covariate Moderation Effects in Multilevel MIMIC Models.

Authors:  Chunhua Cao; Eun Sook Kim; Yi-Hsin Chen; John Ferron; Stephen Stark
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 2.821

9.  Associations between community-level disaster exposure and individual-level changes in disability and risk of death for older Americans.

Authors:  Samuel L Brilleman; Rory Wolfe; Margarita Moreno-Betancur; Anne E Sales; Kenneth M Langa; Yun Li; Elizabeth L Daugherty Biddison; Lewis Rubinson; Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Cohort Trends in the Gender Distribution of Household Tasks in the United States and the Implications for Understanding Disability.

Authors:  Connor Sheehan; Benjamin W Domingue; Eileen Crimmins
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2018-08-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.