BACKGROUND: Certain dietary components may play a role in the prevention of type 2 diabetes. OBJECTIVE: We examined prospectively the associations between whole- and refined-grain intake and the risk of type 2 diabetes in a large cohort of men. DESIGN: Men from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study without a history of diabetes or cardiovascular disease in 1986 (n = 42898) were followed for </=12 y. Intakes of whole and refined grains, measured every 4 y by use of food-frequency questionnaires, were used to predict subsequent type 2 diabetes risk through multivariate analysis. RESULTS: We ascertained 1197 cases of incident type 2 diabetes. After adjustment for age; physical activity; cigarette smoking; alcohol consumption; family history of diabetes; and fruit, vegetable, and energy intakes, the relative risk of type 2 diabetes was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.47, 0.70; P for trend < 0.0001) comparing the highest with the lowest quintile of whole-grain intake. The association was moderately attenuated when additionally adjusted for body mass index (relative risk: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.57, 0.85; P for trend = 0.0006). Intake of refined grains was not significantly associated with risk of type 2 diabetes. After further adjustment for magnesium intake, cereal fiber intake, and glycemic load, the association between whole grains and type 2 diabetes was attenuated and the trend no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: In men, a diet high in whole grains is associated with a reduced risk of type 2 diabetes in men that may be mediated by cereal fiber. Efforts should be made to replace refined-grain with whole-grain foods.
BACKGROUND: Certain dietary components may play a role in the prevention of type 2 diabetes. OBJECTIVE: We examined prospectively the associations between whole- and refined-grain intake and the risk of type 2 diabetes in a large cohort of men. DESIGN:Men from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study without a history of diabetes or cardiovascular disease in 1986 (n = 42898) were followed for </=12 y. Intakes of whole and refined grains, measured every 4 y by use of food-frequency questionnaires, were used to predict subsequent type 2 diabetes risk through multivariate analysis. RESULTS: We ascertained 1197 cases of incident type 2 diabetes. After adjustment for age; physical activity; cigarette smoking; alcohol consumption; family history of diabetes; and fruit, vegetable, and energy intakes, the relative risk of type 2 diabetes was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.47, 0.70; P for trend < 0.0001) comparing the highest with the lowest quintile of whole-grain intake. The association was moderately attenuated when additionally adjusted for body mass index (relative risk: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.57, 0.85; P for trend = 0.0006). Intake of refined grains was not significantly associated with risk of type 2 diabetes. After further adjustment for magnesium intake, cereal fiber intake, and glycemic load, the association between whole grains and type 2 diabetes was attenuated and the trend no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: In men, a diet high in whole grains is associated with a reduced risk of type 2 diabetes in men that may be mediated by cereal fiber. Efforts should be made to replace refined-grain with whole-grain foods.
Authors: Jennifer A Nettleton; Nena Matijevic; Jack L Follis; Aaron R Folsom; Eric Boerwinkle Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2010-04-29 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Matthias B Schulze; Kurt Hoffmann; JoAnn E Manson; Walter C Willett; James B Meigs; Cornelia Weikert; Christin Heidemann; Graham A Colditz; Frank B Hu Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Sarah L Goff; Joanne M Foody; Silvio Inzucchi; David Katz; Susan T Mayne; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Inés Martínez; James M Lattimer; Kelcie L Hubach; Jennifer A Case; Junyi Yang; Casey G Weber; Julie A Louk; Devin J Rose; Gayaneh Kyureghian; Daniel A Peterson; Mark D Haub; Jens Walter Journal: ISME J Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: Rachel C Masters; Angela D Liese; Steven M Haffner; Lynne E Wagenknecht; Anthony J Hanley Journal: J Nutr Date: 2010-01-20 Impact factor: 4.798