Literature DB >> 12196433

Intravenous glargine and regular insulin have similar effects on endogenous glucose output and peripheral activation/deactivation kinetic profiles.

Sunder Mudaliar1, Pharis Mohideen, Reena Deutsch, Theodore P Ciaraldi, Debra Armstrong, Bo Kim, Xue Sha, Robert R Henry.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of intravenously administered long-acting insulin analog glargine and regular human insulin on activation and deactivation of endogenous glucose output (EGO) and peripheral glucose uptake. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this single-center, randomized, double-blind, crossover euglycemic glucose clamp study, 15 healthy male volunteers (aged 27 +/- 4 years, BMI 24.2 +/- 0.7 kg/m(2) [mean +/- SE]) received a primed continuous intravenous infusion of 40 mU/m(2) of insulin glargine or regular human insulin on 2 different study days in a randomized order. Euglycemia was maintained at 90 mg/dl using a simultaneous variable intravenous infusion of 20% dextrose containing D-[3-(3)H]glucose. EGO and peripheral glucose disposal kinetics were determined during a 4-h insulin infusion activation period and a 3-h deactivation period.
RESULTS: The results demonstrated no significant difference in activation or deactivation kinetics with respect to EGO and peripheral glucose disposal between insulin glargine and regular human insulin when given intravenously. The mean +/- SE time required for 50% suppression of EGO after insulin infusion was 73 +/- 23 min for regular insulin and 57 +/- 20 min for insulin glargine (NS). The mean maximum rate of glucose disposal was 10.10 +/- 0.77 and 9.90 +/- 0.85 mg. kg(-1). min(-1) for regular insulin and insulin glargine, respectively (NS). The mean time required for 50% suppression of incremental glucose disposal rate (GDR), defined as the time required for activation from the basal glucose disappearance rate (R(d)) to half-maximum insulin-stimulated R(d), was 32 +/- 5 and 42 +/- 10 min for regular insulin and insulin glargine, respectively (NS). The time required for deactivation from maximum insulin-stimulated GDR to half-maximum GDR after cessation of insulin infusion was 63 +/- 5 and 57 +/- 4 min for regular insulin and insulin glargine, respectively (NS).
CONCLUSIONS: Activation and deactivation kinetics of EGO and peripheral glucose uptake as well as absolute disposal rate are similar between regular human insulin and insulin glargine when administered intravenously. Thus, the various biological actions of these insulin preparations when given subcutaneously are completely due to their different absorption kinetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12196433     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.25.9.1597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  10 in total

1.  Intermediary variables and algorithm parameters for an electronic algorithm for intravenous insulin infusion.

Authors:  Susan S Braithwaite; Hemant Godara; Julie Song; Bruce A Cairns; Samuel W Jones; Guillermo E Umpierrez
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

2.  Comparison of insulins detemir and glargine: effects on glucose disposal, hepatic glucose release and the central nervous system.

Authors:  M C Moore; M S Smith; M K Turney; S Boysen; P E Williams
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 6.577

Review 3.  Hypoglycemia Reduction Strategies in the ICU.

Authors:  Susan Shapiro Braithwaite; Dharmesh B Bavda; Thaer Idrees; Faisal Qureshi; Oluwakemi T Soetan
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.810

4.  Metabolic and hormonal changes induced by pioglitazone in polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Vanita R Aroda; Theodore P Ciaraldi; Paivi Burke; Sunder Mudaliar; Paul Clopton; Susan Phillips; R Jeffrey Chang; Robert R Henry
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 5.  Hypoglycemia Prevention by Algorithm Design During Intravenous Insulin Infusion.

Authors:  Susan Shapiro Braithwaite; Lisa P Clark; Thaer Idrees; Faisal Qureshi; Oluwakemi T Soetan
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 6.  Treatment of sulfonylurea and insulin overdose.

Authors:  Wendy Klein-Schwartz; Gina L Stassinos; Geoffrey K Isbister
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  Insulin glargine: an updated review of its use in the management of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Christopher J Dunn; Greg L Plosker; Gillian M Keating; Kate McKeage; Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Canagliflozin lowers postprandial glucose and insulin by delaying intestinal glucose absorption in addition to increasing urinary glucose excretion: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  David Polidori; Sue Sha; Sunder Mudaliar; Theodore P Ciaraldi; Atalanta Ghosh; Nicole Vaccaro; Kristin Farrell; Paul Rothenberg; Robert R Henry
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Relationship between anti-insulin antibody production and severe insulin resistance in a diabetic cat.

Authors:  Takumi Komiya; Akihiro Mori; Naohito Nishii; Hitomi Oda; Eri Onozawa; Seri Seki; Toshinori Sako
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.267

10.  Equipotency of insulin glargine 300 and 100 U/mL with intravenous dosing but differential bioavailability with subcutaneous dosing in dogs.

Authors:  Ulrich Werner; Norbert Tennagels; Carmine G Fanelli; Geremia B Bolli
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.577

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.