M C Moore1, M S Smith, M K Turney, S Boysen, P E Williams. 1. Department of Molecular Physiology & Biophysics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232-0615, USA. genie.moore@vanderbilt.edu
Abstract
AIMS: The effects of insulins detemir (Det) and glargine (Glar) on endogenous glucose production (EGP) and net hepatic glucose output (NHGO) were compared. METHODS: Arteriovenous difference and tracer ([3-(3) H]glucose) techniques were employed during a two-step hyperinsulinemic euglycaemic clamp in conscious dogs (6 groups, n = 5-6/group). After equilibration and basal sampling (0-120 min), somatostatin was infused and basal glucagon was replaced intraportally. Det or Glar was infused via portal vein (Po), peripheral vein (IV), or bilateral carotid and vertebral arteries (H) at 0.1 and 0.3 mU/kg/min (low Insulin; Glar vs. Det, respectively, 120-420 min) and 4× the low insulin rate (high insulin; 420-540 min). RESULTS: NHGO and EGP were suppressed and glucose R(d) and infusion rate were stimulated similarly by Det and Glar at both Low and high insulin with each infusion route. Non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) concentrations during low insulin were 202 ± 37 versus 323 ± 75 µM in DetPo and GlarPo (p < 0.05) and 125 ± 39 versus 263 ± 48 µM in DetIV and GlarIV, respectively (p < 0.05). In DetH versus GlarH, pAkt/Akt (1.7 ± 0.2 vs. 1.0 ± 0.2) and pSTAT3/STAT3 (1.4 ± 0.2 vs. 1.0 ± 0.1) were significantly increased in the liver but not in the hypothalamus. CONCLUSIONS: Det and Glar have similar net effects on acute regulation of hepatic glucose metabolism in vivo regardless of delivery route. Portal and IV detemir delivery reduces circulating NEFA to a greater extent than glargine, and head detemir infusion enhances molecular signalling in the liver. These findings indicate a need for further examination of Det's central and hepatic effects.
AIMS: The effects of insulins detemir (Det) and glargine (Glar) on endogenous glucose production (EGP) and net hepatic glucose output (NHGO) were compared. METHODS: Arteriovenous difference and tracer ([3-(3) H]glucose) techniques were employed during a two-step hyperinsulinemic euglycaemic clamp in conscious dogs (6 groups, n = 5-6/group). After equilibration and basal sampling (0-120 min), somatostatin was infused and basal glucagon was replaced intraportally. Det or Glar was infused via portal vein (Po), peripheral vein (IV), or bilateral carotid and vertebral arteries (H) at 0.1 and 0.3 mU/kg/min (low Insulin; Glar vs. Det, respectively, 120-420 min) and 4× the low insulin rate (high insulin; 420-540 min). RESULTS:NHGO and EGP were suppressed and glucose R(d) and infusion rate were stimulated similarly by Det and Glar at both Low and high insulin with each infusion route. Non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) concentrations during low insulin were 202 ± 37 versus 323 ± 75 µM in DetPo and GlarPo (p < 0.05) and 125 ± 39 versus 263 ± 48 µM in DetIV and GlarIV, respectively (p < 0.05). In DetH versus GlarH, pAkt/Akt (1.7 ± 0.2 vs. 1.0 ± 0.2) and pSTAT3/STAT3 (1.4 ± 0.2 vs. 1.0 ± 0.1) were significantly increased in the liver but not in the hypothalamus. CONCLUSIONS:Det and Glar have similar net effects on acute regulation of hepatic glucose metabolism in vivo regardless of delivery route. Portal and IV detemir delivery reduces circulating NEFA to a greater extent than glargine, and head detemir infusion enhances molecular signalling in the liver. These findings indicate a need for further examination of Det's central and hepatic effects.
Authors: G Gupta; J A Cases; L She; X H Ma; X M Yang; M Hu; J Wu; L Rossetti; N Barzilai Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: M Stumvoll; S Jacob; H G Wahl; B Hauer; K Löblein; P Grauer; R Becker; M Nielsen; W Renn; H Häring Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Thomas Scherer; James O'Hare; Kelly Diggs-Andrews; Martina Schweiger; Bob Cheng; Claudia Lindtner; Elizabeth Zielinski; Prashant Vempati; Kai Su; Shveta Dighe; Thomas Milsom; Michelle Puchowicz; Ludger Scheja; Rudolf Zechner; Simon J Fisher; Stephen F Previs; Christoph Buettner Journal: Cell Metab Date: 2011-02-02 Impact factor: 27.287
Authors: Christopher J Ramnanan; Dale S Edgerton; Noelia Rivera; Jose Irimia-Dominguez; Ben Farmer; Doss W Neal; Margaret Lautz; E Patrick Donahue; Catalina M Meyer; Peter J Roach; Alan D Cherrington Journal: Diabetes Date: 2010-02-25 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: A R Sørensen; C E Stidsen; U Ribel; E Nishimura; J Sturis; I Jonassen; S D Bouman; P Kurtzhals; C L Brand Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 6.577
Authors: Zhihui Wang; Maka S Hedrington; Nino Gogitidze Joy; Vanessa J Briscoe; M Antoinette Richardson; Lisa Younk; Wendell Nicholson; Donna B Tate; Stephen N Davis Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-03-31 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: F Smeeton; F Shojaee Moradie; R H Jones; L Westergaard; H Haahr; A M Umpleby; D L Russell-Jones Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2009-08-26 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: D Russell-Jones; T Danne; K Hermansen; K Niswender; K Robertson; N Thalange; J R Vasselli; B Yildiz; H U Häring Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2015-08-11 Impact factor: 6.577
Authors: Mary Courtney Moore; Marta S Smith; Vikram P Sinha; John M Beals; M Dodson Michael; Scott J Jacober; Alan D Cherrington Journal: Diabetes Date: 2013-10-02 Impact factor: 9.461