Literature DB >> 12196371

Prevalence and prognostic role of microsatellite instability in patients with rectal carcinoma.

M Colombino1, A Cossu, A Manca, M F Dedola, M Giordano, F Scintu, A Curci, A Avallone, G Comella, M Amoruso, A Margari, G M Bonomo, M Castriota, F Tanda, G Palmieri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Association between microsatellite instability (MSI) and favorable postoperative survival in patients with colorectal cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy has been indicated. To evaluate whether an analogous positive prognostic role of MSI could be present in rectal carcinoma (RC; most RC patients receive adjuvant radiotherapy), PCR-based microsatellite analysis of archival RCs and statistical correlation with clinico-pathological parameters were performed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: DNA from paraffin-embedded paired samples of tumors and corresponding normal tissue from 91 RC patients was analyzed for MSI using five microsatellite markers (tumors were classified as MSI(+) when two or more markers were unstable).
RESULTS: Seventeen (19%) RC patients exhibited a MSI(+) phenotype. Prevalence of instability was found in patients with earlier RC onset (28% in cases with diagnosis age < or =55 years versus 15% in cases >55 years), whereas similar MSI frequencies were observed in patients with different disease stage or receiving different adjuvant therapies. While MSI was detected in seven (64%) of 11 familial patients, a remarkably lower MSI incidence was observed in sporadic cases (10/80; 12.5%). A significant association with better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was found for MSI(+) patients (median DFS/OS, 30/32 months) in comparison to MSI(-) ones (median DFS/OS, 18/21 months) (P <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: MSI was demonstrated to be a strong molecular prognostic marker in rectal carcinoma, independent of the administered treatment (radiotherapy, chemotherapy or both).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12196371     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdf240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  18 in total

Review 1.  Molecular classification and correlates in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Ajay Goel
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 5.568

2.  Relationships of tumor inflammatory infiltration and necrosis with microsatellite instability in colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Jing-Fang Gao; Gunnar Arbman; Tabasum Imran Wadhra; Hong Zhang; Xiao-Feng Sun
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Microsatellite instability and survival in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Wade S Samowitz; Karen Curtin; Roger K Wolff; Sheryl R Tripp; Bette J Caan; Martha L Slattery
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 4.  Personalized medicine and oncology practice guidelines: a case study of contemporary biomarkers in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Robin K Kelley; Stephanie L Van Bebber; Kathryn A Phillips; Alan P Venook
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 11.908

5.  Microsatellite instability predicts clinical outcome in radiation-treated endometrioid endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Cristina Bilbao; Pedro Carlos Lara; Raquel Ramírez; Luis Alberto Henríquez-Hernández; Germán Rodríguez; Orlando Falcón; Laureano León; Manuel Perucho; Bonifacio Nicolás Díaz-Chico; Juan Carlos Díaz-Chico
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Colorectal carcinomas with microsatellite instability display a different pattern of target gene mutations according to large bowel site of origin.

Authors:  Manuela Pinheiro; Terje Ahlquist; Stine A Danielsen; Guro E Lind; Isabel Veiga; Carla Pinto; Vera Costa; Luís Afonso; Olga Sousa; Maria Fragoso; Lúcio Santos; Rui Henrique; Paula Lopes; Carlos Lopes; Ragnhild A Lothe; Manuel R Teixeira
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  DNA variants in the ATM gene are not associated with sporadic rectal cancer in a Norwegian population-based study.

Authors:  Annette Torgunrud Kristensen; Jens Bjørheim; Johan Wiig; Karl E Giercksky; Per O Ekstrøm
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-06-21       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Prognostic Significance of Clinicopathological and Molecular Features After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Hee Jeong Cho; Jin Ho Baek; Dong Won Baek; Byung Woog Kang; Soo Jung Lee; Hye Jin Kim; Su Yeon Park; Jun Seok Park; Gyu Seog Choi; Jong Gwang Kim
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Prevalence of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA somatic mutations in patients with colorectal carcinoma may vary in the same population: clues from Sardinia.

Authors:  Grazia Palomba; Maria Colombino; Antonio Contu; Bruno Massidda; Giovanni Baldino; Antonio Pazzola; MariaTeresa Ionta; Francesca Capelli; Vittorio Trova; Tito Sedda; Giovanni Sanna; Francesco Tanda; Mario Budroni; Giuseppe Palmieri; Antonio Cossu; Marta Contu; Angelo Cuccu; Antonio Farris; Antonio Macciò; Giuseppe Mameli; Nina Olmeo; Salvatore Ortu; Elisabetta Petretto; Valeria Pusceddu; Luciano Virdis
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 5.531

10.  Clinical impact of HLA class I expression in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Frank M Speetjens; Elza C de Bruin; Hans Morreau; Eliane C M Zeestraten; Hein Putter; J Han van Krieken; Maaike M van Buren; Monique van Velzen; N Geeske Dekker-Ensink; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Peter J K Kuppen
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 6.968

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.