Literature DB >> 12196274

Ductal lavage and ductoscopy: the opportunities and the limitations.

Seema A Khan1, Carol Baird, Valerie L Staradub, Monica Morrow.   

Abstract

Two related techniques of breast epithelial sampling have emerged in the past several years: ductal lavage, in which fluid-yielding nipple ducts are cannulated at their orifices and lavaged with saline while the breast is intermittently massaged; and ductoscopy, in which discharging or fluid-yielding duct orifices are dilated, intubated with a microendoscope, and the lumen directly visualized. Both of these techniques have significant potential in terms of allowing the repeated sampling of ductal epithelium over time and, as such, have generated considerable enthusiasm. However, data regarding the impact of these techniques on the detection of significant breast disease is very scant. It is important at the outset of the assessment of this new technology that breast cancer clinicians and clinical researchers think carefully about the standards of evidence that need to be met regarding the benefits of these procedures before they are widely adopted. In this review of the rationale and early results of these procedures, we attempt to define some of these evidentiary requirements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12196274     DOI: 10.3816/CBC.2002.n.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1526-8209            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

Review 1.  Novel agents for chemoprevention, screening methods, and sampling issues.

Authors:  Mary Jo Fackler; Ella Evron; Seema A Khan; Saraswati Sukumar
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.673

2.  A comparison of ductoscopy-guided and conventional surgical excision in women with spontaneous nipple discharge.

Authors:  Robyn M Moncrief; Ritu Nayar; Leslie K Diaz; Valerie L Staradub; Monica Morrow; Seema A Khan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Mammary ductoscopy in the current management of breast disease.

Authors:  Sarah S K Tang; Dominique J Twelves; Clare M Isacke; Gerald P H Gui
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Does ductal lavage assert its role as a noninvasive diagnostic modality to identify women at low risk of breast cancer development?

Authors:  Ioanna Konstandiadou; Aikaterini Mastoraki; Olympia Kotsilianou; Petros Karakitsos; George Athanasas; Vasilios Smyrniotis; Nikolaos Arkadopoulos
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 5.  The diagnosis and management of pre-invasive breast disease: the role of new diagnostic techniques.

Authors:  Ashutosh Nerurkar; Peter Osin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 6.  The diagnosis and management of pre-invasive breast disease: pathological diagnosis--problems with existing classifications.

Authors:  Marc J Van de Vijver; Hans Peterse
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2003-07-29       Impact factor: 6.466

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.