Literature DB >> 12195475

Computer-aided diagnosis in contrast-enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast.

Wolfgang Luboldt1, Carolin Mann, Cathy L Tryon, Reinhard Vonthein, Dietmar Stueker, Manuela Kroll, Oliver Luz, Claus D Claussen, Thomas J Vogl.   

Abstract

Automation in colorectal mass detection is achieved as soon as the voxels representing colorectal masses can be automatically segmented. We tested the Hounsfield (HU) value in intensely contrast enhanced high-resolution CT colonography for automated segmentation of colorectal masses in 18 patients with 35 polyps (28 < 10 mm, 7 > or = 10 mm) and 7 carcinomas. Mean HU values of the colonic wall and masses were determined to deduce a gradient threshold for a segmentation process, which encodes the voxels bordering the colonic lumen with a colour ranging in intensity from 0 to 100% according to the selected gradient threshold range in the volume rendering. The results of the automated segmentation process were superimposed on a virtual double contrast and endoscopic display and validated through correlation with morphology. Mean HU values and their standard deviations for the colonic wall, polyps < 10 mm, polyps > or = 10 mm and carcinomas were 63 +/- 24, 154 +/- 38, 116 +/- 41 and 108+/-29 HU, respectively. A gradient threshold ranging from 90 to 160 HU resulted in colour pools in 6 of 7 of polyps > or = 10 mm, and 6 of 7 carcinomas that were significant enough to prospectively guide the reader's attention to these masses. Due to the superposition of "false-positive" voxels in the projection view, the virtual endoscopic perspective was superior to the virtual double contrast display for controlling the segmentation results. The HU value is promising for automated segmentation of colorectal masses but needs to be combined with morphological parameters to render automated colorectal mass detection more accurate. Further refinements of the method with subsequent analysis of its accuracy, as well as analogue studies with contrast-enhanced MRI, appear warranted. More information at http://www.multiorganscreening.org

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12195475     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-002-1377-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  10 in total

1.  Virtual endoscopy of the nasopharynx in the evaluation of its normal anatomy and alterations due to lymphoid hyperplasia: preliminary report.

Authors:  Ignazio Pandolfo; Silvio Mazziotti; Giorgio Ascenti; Sergio Vinci; Ignazio Salamone; Giovanni Colletti; Alfredo Blandino
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Multidetector CT of the colon.

Authors:  W Luboldt; N Hoepffner; K Holzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Automated mass detection in contrast-enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast and volume.

Authors:  W Luboldt; C Tryon; M Kroll; T L Toussaint; K Holzer; N Hoepffner; T J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Reader error during CT colonography: causes and implications for training.

Authors:  Andrew Slater; Stuart A Taylor; Emily Tam; Louise Gartner; Julia Scarth; Chand Peiris; Arun Gupta; Michele Marshall; David Burling; Steve Halligan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Importance of extracolonic findings at IV contrast medium-enhanced CT colonography versus those at non-enhanced CT colonography.

Authors:  Adrian Spreng; Peter Netzer; Joerg Mattich; Hans-Peter Dinkel; Peter Vock; Hanno Hoppe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Polyethylene glycol solution (PEG) plus contrast medium vs PEG alone preparation for CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy in preoperative colorectal cancer staging.

Authors:  Koichi Nagata; Shungo Endo; Tamaki Ichikawa; Keisuke Dasai; Katsuyuki Moriya; Tamio Kushihashi; Shin-ei Kudo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Phase- and size-adjusted CT cut-off for differentiating neoplastic lesions from normal colon in contrast-enhanced CT colonography.

Authors:  W Luboldt; M Kroll; A Wetter; T L Toussaint; N Hoepffner; K Holzer; A Kluge; T J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  CT virtual reality in the preoperative workup of malunited distal radius fractures: preliminary results.

Authors:  Michael Rieger; Markus Gabl; Hannes Gruber; Werner R Jaschke; Ammar Mallouhi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Supine/left decubitus scanning: a valuable alternative to supine/prone scanning in CT colonography.

Authors:  Stefaan S Gryspeerdt; Murielle J Herman; Marc A Baekelandt; Bartel G van Holsbeeck; Philippe A Lefere
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Effect of computer-aided detection as a second reader in multidetector-row CT colonography.

Authors:  Thomas Mang; Philipp Peloschek; Christina Plank; Andrea Maier; Anno Graser; Michael Weber; Christian Herold; Luca Bogoni; Wolfgang Schima
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-03-10       Impact factor: 7.034

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.