Literature DB >> 12195328

Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope allows completion of colonoscopy after failure with the standard adult colonoscope.

D A Shumaker1, A Zaman, R M Katon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Experts fail to reach the cecum in 2 - 10% of colonoscopies. The purpose of this case series was to evaluate the efficacy of a small-caliber, variable-stiffness colonoscope in patients with incomplete colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The variable-stiffness colonoscope (Olympus America XPCF-140AL) was used by the same examiner to reattempt colonoscopy immediately in all patients in whom colonoscopy to the cecum with the standard colonoscope was incomplete.
RESULTS: Sixteen of 385 attempted colonoscopies (4.2%) did not reach the cecum with the standard colonoscope due to looping (n = 12), fixed angulation of the sigmoid colon (n = 3), and diverticulosis (n = 1). The procedures were deemed a failure after a mean of 28 min, despite the use of abdominal pressure and positional change in all patients. Fifteen of the 16 patients (94 %) had a complete colonoscopy with the variable-stiffness colonoscope. One patient had an incomplete colonoscopy with the variable-stiffness colonoscope due to an obstructing mass in the transverse colon that was not reached by the standard colonoscope. With the variable-stiffness colonoscope, the mean time to cecal intubation was 10.3 min; four patients (25 %) required a change in patient position, and six patients (37.5 %) required abdominal pressure.
CONCLUSIONS: A variable-stiffness colonoscope allowed completion of colonoscopy in all patients without obstruction who had an incomplete colonoscopy with the standard colonoscope. Further study is needed to determine whether the variable-stiffness colonoscope should be used routinely for colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12195328     DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-33442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  9 in total

1.  Endoscopic management of failed colonoscopy in clinical practice: to change endoscopist, instrument, or both?

Authors:  Sergio Morini; Angelo Zullo; Cesare Hassan; Roberto Lorenzetti; Salvatore M A Campo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  A prospective randomized study of the use of an ultrathin colonoscope versus a pediatric colonoscope in sedation-optional colonoscopy.

Authors:  Koichiro Sato; Sayo Ito; Tomoyuki Kitagawa; Koichi Hirahata; Daisuke Hihara; Kenji Tominaga; Ichiro Yasuda; Iruru Maetani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Is there a role for colon capsule endoscopy beyond colorectal cancer screening? A literature review.

Authors:  Konstantinos Triantafyllou; Iosif Beintaris; George D Dimitriadis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Transparent hood attached to the colonoscope: does it really work for all types of colonoscopes?

Authors:  Takashi Shida; Yosuke Katsuura; Osamu Teramoto; Makoto Kaiho; Shigetsugu Takano; Hiroyuki Yoshidome; Masaru Miyazaki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  "Passive-bending colonoscope" significantly improves cecal intubation in difficult cases.

Authors:  Takeshi Mizukami; Haruhiko Ogata; Toshihumi Hibi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  CO(2) insufflation for potentially difficult colonoscopies: efficacy when used by less experienced colonoscopists.

Authors:  Toshio Uraoka; Jun Kato; Motoaki Kuriyama; Keisuke Hori; Shin Ishikawa; Keita Harada; Koji Takemoto; Sakiko Hiraoka; Hideyuki Fujita; Joichiro Horii; Yutaka Saito; Kazuhide Yamamoto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Double-Balloon Endoscopy after Incomplete Colonoscopy and Its Comparison with Computed Tomography Colonography.

Authors:  Carlijn Hermans; Dennis van der Zee; Lennard Gilissen
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2018-01-10

8.  Prospective evaluation of the motorized spiral enteroscope for previous incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  Abdulbaqi Al-Toma; Dorien M Oude Hergelink; Jacco Tenthof van Noorden; Jan Jacob Koornstra
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-08-15

9.  Does the variable-stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier? A meta-analysis of the efficacy of the variable stiffness colonoscope compared with the standard adult colonoscope.

Authors:  Qin Xie; Bin Chen; Liu Liu; Huatian Gan
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.067

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.