Literature DB >> 12195091

Determination of the prognostic value of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by using positron emission tomography in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

H-J Jeong1, J-J Min, J M Park, J-K Chung, B T Kim, J M Jeong, D S Lee, M C Lee, S K Han, Y S Shim.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether quantitative information obtained from [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET) has a prognostic significance for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated (18)F-FDG PET imaging of 73 patients with NSCLC. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) was significantly different between the histopathological types of tumour (squamous cell carcinoma (n=37, 12.4+/-5.1), adenocarcinoma (n=30, 8.2+/-5.8), bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (n=4, 2.6+/-1.7), <0.01). In the univariate analysis of all patients, staging (P=0.0001), tumour cell type (P=0.013), and a SUV(max) greater than 7 (P=0.0011) was correlated with survival. However, a multivariate analysis identified staging and SUV(max) greater than 7 were affected survival adversely. The mortality rate of patients with group I disease (stage I to stage IIIA) was 5.8 times lower than that of patients with group II disease (stage IIIB to stage IV). Patients with a high SUV(max) (> or =7) had a 6.3 times higher mortality than those with a low SUV(max)(<7). By multivariate analysis of patients with squamous cell carcinoma, only grouping affected survival (P=0.008, relative risk=4.3). In the case of adenocarcinoma, the SUV(max) (>10) correlated exclusively with poorer survival (P=0.031, relative risk=11.152). (18)F-FDG uptake correlated with survival in NSCLC. Especially in adenocarcinomas, the SUV(max) was complementary to other known prognostic factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12195091     DOI: 10.1097/00006231-200209000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Commun        ISSN: 0143-3636            Impact factor:   1.690


  27 in total

1.  The role of (18)F-FDG PET in the differentiation between lung metastases and synchronous second primary lung tumours.

Authors:  Bernadette G Dijkman; Olga C J Schuurbiers; Dennis Vriens; Monika Looijen-Salamon; Johan Bussink; Johanna N H Timmer-Bonte; Miranda M Snoeren; Wim J G Oyen; Henricus F M van der Heijden; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Diagnostic performance and prognostic impact of FDG-PET in suspected recurrence of surgically treated non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Dirk Hellwig; Andreas Gröschel; Thomas P Graeter; Anne P Hellwig; Ursula Nestle; Hans-Joachim Schäfers; Gerhard W Sybrecht; Carl-Martin Kirsch
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  PET-CT in the staging and treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Patricia Ibeas; Blanca Cantos; José Manuel Gasent; Begoña Rodríguez; Mariano Provencio
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  A case report: pancreatic squamous cell carcinoma with effective response by S-1 therapy.

Authors:  Atsuki Ikeda; Tatsuya Okuno; Ikuya Miki; Hiroshi Yokozaki; Hiromu Kutsumi; Takeshi Azuma
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-01

5.  Blood flow-metabolic relationships are dependent on tumour size in non-small cell lung cancer: a study using quantitative contrast-enhanced computer tomography and positron emission tomography.

Authors:  K A Miles; M R Griffiths; C J Keith
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Is standardised (18)F-FDG uptake value an outcome predictor in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer?

Authors:  S M Eschmann; G Friedel; F Paulsen; M Reimold; T Hehr; W Budach; J Scheiderbauer; H J Machulla; H Dittmann; R Vonthein; R Bares
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Prognostic value of FDG uptake in primary inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  An-Na Tong; Shao-Rong Han; Peng Yan; Hai Gong; Hui Zhao; Hui Yao; Yan-Ming Wang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 8.  Positron emission tomography/computer tomography: challenge to conventional imaging modalities in evaluating primary and metastatic liver malignancies.

Authors:  Long Sun; Hua Wu; Yong-Song Guan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  11C-methionine PET as a prognostic marker in patients with glioma: comparison with 18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Sungeun Kim; June-Key Chung; So-Hyang Im; Jae Min Jeong; Dong Soo Lee; Dong Gyu Kim; Hee Won Jung; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-08-10       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Positron emission tomography in the management of lung cancer.

Authors:  Vahid Reza Dabbagh Kakhki
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.219

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.