Literature DB >> 12195064

The cochrane review of advice to stay active as a single treatment for low back pain and sciatica.

Kåre B Hagen1, Gunvor Hilde, Gro Jamtvedt, Michael F Winnem.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A systematic review was conducted within the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of advice to stay active as a single treatment for patients with acute low back pain or sciatica. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Low back pain is a common reason for consulting a health care provider, and advice on daily activities constitutes an important part in the primary care management of low back pain.
METHODS: All randomized studies available in systematic searches (electronic databases, contact with authors, reference lists) were included. Two reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed the validity of the included trials, and extracted data. Investigators were contacted to obtain missing information.
RESULTS: Four trials, with a total of 491 patients, were included. In all the trials, advice to stay active was compared with advice for bed rest. Two trials were assessed as having a low risk of bias, and two as having a moderate to high risk of bias. The results were heterogeneous. The results from one high-quality trial of patients with acute, simple low back pain found small differences in functional status (weighted mean difference on a 0 to 100 scale, 6.0; 95% CI, 1.5-10.5) and length of sick leave (weighted mean difference, 3.4 days; 95% CI, 1.6-5.2) in favor of staying active, as compared with advice to stay in bed 2 days. The other high-quality trial compared advice to stay active with advice to rest in bed 14 days for patients with sciatic syndrome, and found no differences between the groups. One of the high-quality trials also compared advice to stay active with advice to engage in exercises for patients with acute, simple low back pain, and found improvement in functional status and reduced sick leave in favor of advice to stay active.
CONCLUSION: The best available evidence suggests that advice to stay active alone has little beneficial effect for patients with acute, simple low back pain, and little or no effect for patients with sciatica. There is no evidence that advice to stay active is harmful for either acute low back pain or sciatica. Because there is no considerable difference between advice to stay active and advice for bed rest, and there are potential harmful effects of prolonged bed rest, it is reasonable to advise people with acute low back pain and sciatica to stay active. These conclusions are based on single trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12195064     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200208150-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  13 in total

Review 1.  Managing low back pain in the primary care setting: the know-do gap.

Authors:  N Ann Scott; Carmen Moga; Christa Harstall
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 2.  Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  I A Steenstra; J H Verbeek; M W Heymans; P M Bongers
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Validation of a risk factor-based intervention strategy model using data from the readiness for return to work cohort study.

Authors:  Ivan A Steenstra; Selahadin A Ibrahim; Renée-Louise Franche; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; William S Shaw; Glenn S Pransky
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2010-09

4.  Effects of recreational physical activity and back exercises on low back pain and psychological distress: findings from the UCLA Low Back Pain Study.

Authors:  Eric L Hurwitz; Hal Morgenstern; Chi Chiao
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  The association between symptom severity and physical activity participation in people seeking care for acute low back pain.

Authors:  Juliana Leme Gomes; M Kingma; S J Kamper; C G Maher; P H Ferreira; A P Marques; M L Ferreira
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-18       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Early patient screening and intervention to address individual-level occupational factors ("blue flags") in back disability.

Authors:  William S Shaw; Danielle A van der Windt; Chris J Main; Patrick Loisel; Steven J Linton
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-12-12

7.  Comparable effectiveness of caudal vs. trans-foraminal epidural steroid injections.

Authors:  Sergio Mendoza-Lattes; Andrew Weiss; Ernest Found; Bridget Zimmerman; Yubo Gao
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2009

8.  Changes in the incidence of occupational disability as a result of back and neck pain in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Ivan A Steenstra; Jos H Verbeek; Femmeke J Prinsze; Dirk L Knol
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Effect of a simple information booklet on pain persistence after an acute episode of low back pain: a non-randomized trial in a primary care setting.

Authors:  Emmanuel Coudeyre; Florence Tubach; François Rannou; Gabriel Baron; Fernand Coriat; Sylvie Brin; Michel Revel; Serge Poiraudeau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  UK Back pain Exercise And Manipulation (UK BEAM) trial--national randomised trial of physical treatments for back pain in primary care: objectives, design and interventions [ISRCTN32683578].

Authors:  S Brealey; K Burton; S Coulton; A Farrin; A Garratt; E Harvey; L Letley; J Martin; Moffett J Klaber; I Russell; D Torgerson; M Underwood; M Vickers; K Whyte; M Williams
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.