Literature DB >> 12194365

Modelling of DNA damage induced by energetic electrons (100 eV to 100 keV).

H Nikjoo1, C E Bolton, R Watanabe, M Terrissol, P O'Neill, D T Goodhead.   

Abstract

Modelling and calculations are presented for the spectrum of initial DNA damage produced by 100 eV to 100 keV energetic electrons. Analysis of the initial spectrum of damage, based upon the source (direct energy deposition and reactions with diffusing OH radicals) and complexity of damage, indicates that the majority of the interactions cause no damage to DNA and any damage that does occur is most likely to be a simple single strand break (SSB). The fraction of complex damage for energetic electrons is lower than that induced by low energy electrons and ultrasoft X rays but still represents an appreciable fraction (20-30%) of the total double strand breaks (DSBs). Relative yields of strand breaks are investigated for dependence on the assumed energy deposition threshold and on the probability of the hydroxyl radicals to produce a single strand break. The ratio of direct to indirect damage does not change significantly across the electron energy range investigated and the values lie well within the experimental data. The direct energy deposition in DNA represents a larger proportion of the damage although the contribution from the hydroxyl radicals is also substantial, both in terms of the absolute yield of the breaks and the complexity of the damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12194365     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  16 in total

1.  A new calculation on spectrum of direct DNA damage induced by low-energy electrons.

Authors:  Liming Zhang; Zhenyu Tan
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 2.  Induction of DNA Damage by Light Ions Relative to 60Co γ-rays.

Authors:  Robert D Stewart
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

3.  Estimated yield of double-strand breaks from internal exposure to tritium.

Authors:  Jing Chen
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Inducible response required for repair of low-dose radiation damage in human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Saskia Grudzenski; Antonia Raths; Sandro Conrad; Claudia E Rübe; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Applications of nanodosimetry in particle therapy planning and beyond.

Authors:  Antoni Rucinski; Anna Biernacka; Reinhard Schulte
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Cisplatin intrastrand adducts sensitize DNA to base damage by hydrated electrons.

Authors:  B Behmand; J R Wagner; L Sanche; D J Hunting
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Radiation dose of the lens in trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery: pros and cons of a conventional setup using fluoroscopic guidance and CT-based neuronavigation.

Authors:  S Ulmer; E Schulz; B Moeller; U R Krause; A Nabavi; H M Mehdorn; O Jansen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  DNA Damage Induced in Glioblastoma Cells by I-131: A Comparison between Experimental Data and Monte Carlo Simulation.

Authors:  Ali Neshasteh-Riz; Fereshteh Koosha; Afshin Mohsenifar; Seyed Rabee Mahdavi
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 9.  Comments on potential health effects of MRI-induced DNA lesions: quality is more important to consider than quantity.

Authors:  M A Hill; P O'Neill; W G McKenna
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Complex DNA Damage Induced by High Linear Energy Transfer Alpha-Particles and Protons Triggers a Specific Cellular DNA Damage Response.

Authors:  Rachel J Carter; Catherine M Nickson; James M Thompson; Andrzej Kacperek; Mark A Hill; Jason L Parsons
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.