Literature DB >> 12194291

Genotoxic damage in non-irradiated cells: contribution from the bystander effect.

H Zhou1, G Randers-Pehrson, M Suzuki, C A Waldren, T K Hei.   

Abstract

It has always been accepted dogma that the deleterious effects of ionising radiation such as mutagenesis and carcinogenesis are due mainly to direct damage to DNA. Using the Columbia University charged-particle microbeam and the highly sensitive AL cell mutagenic assay, it is shown here that non-irradiated cells acquire the mutagenic phenotype through direct contact with cells whose nuclei are traversed with 2 alpha particles each. Pre-treatment of cells with lindane, a gap junction inhibitor, significantly decreased the mutant yield. Furthermore, when irradiated cells were mixed with control cells in a similar ratio as the in situ studies, no enhancement in bystander mutagenesis was detected. Our studies provide clear evidence that genotoxic damage can be induced in non-irradiated cells, and that gap junction mediated cell-cell communication plays a critical role in the bystander phenomenon.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12194291     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  13 in total

1.  Effects of irradiated medium with or without cells on bystander cell responses.

Authors:  Hongning Zhou; Masao Suzuki; Charles R Geard; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2002-02-20       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Interaction between radiation-induced adaptive response and bystander mutagenesis in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Hongning Zhou; Gerhard Randers-Pehrson; Charles R Geard; David J Brenner; Eric J Hall; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  H2AX phosphorylation in response to DNA double-strand break formation during bystander signalling: effect of microRNA knockdown.

Authors:  Jennifer S Dickey; Franz J Zemp; Alvin Altamirano; Olga A Sedelnikova; William M Bonner; Olga Kovalchuk
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Connexin43 increases the sensitivity of prostate cancer cells to TNFalpha-induced apoptosis.

Authors:  Min Wang; Viviana M Berthoud; Eric C Beyer
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2007-01-02       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  Radiation-induced bystander effects: evidence for an adaptive response to low dose exposures?

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Colin Seymour
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Investigation of adaptive responses in bystander cells in 3D cultures containing tritium-labeled and unlabeled normal human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Massimo Pinto; Edouard I Azzam; Roger W Howell
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  The effect of ionising radiation on the phenotype of bone marrow-derived extracellular vesicles.

Authors:  Dávid Kis; Eszter Persa; Tünde Szatmári; Lilla Antal; Attila Bóta; Ilona Barbara Csordás; Rita Hargitai; Bálint Jezsó; Enikő Kis; Judith Mihály; Géza Sáfrány; Zoltán Varga; Katalin Lumniczky
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Occupational and environmental causes of lung cancer.

Authors:  R William Field; Brian L Withers
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.878

9.  Susceptibility to bystander DNA damage is influenced by replication and transcriptional activity.

Authors:  Jennifer S Dickey; Brandon J Baird; Christophe E Redon; Valeriya Avdoshina; Guillermo Palchik; Junfang Wu; Alexei Kondratyev; William M Bonner; Olga A Martin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Gap junctional communication promotes apoptosis in a connexin-type-dependent manner.

Authors:  P Kameritsch; N Khandoga; U Pohl; K Pogoda
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 8.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.