Literature DB >> 7749526

The National Veterans Administration Surgical Risk Study: risk adjustment for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care.

S F Khuri1, J Daley, W Henderson, G Barbour, P Lowry, G Irvin, J Gibbs, F Grover, K Hammermeister, J F Stremple.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of surgical outcome in the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care is predicted on the development of proper models that adjust for the severity of the preoperative risk factors of the patient. The National Veterans Administration Surgical Risk Study was designed to collect reliable, valid data about patient risk and outcome for major surgery in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and to report comparative risk-adjusted surgical morbidity and mortality rates for surgical services in VHA. This study describes the rationale and methods used in the Risk Study and reports on the frequency distribution of the data elements that will be used in the development of risk-adjusted reporting of surgical outcome. STUDY
DESIGN: This study was a prospective observational study in which dedicated nurses collected preoperative, intraoperative, and outcome data on patients undergoing noncardiac operations using general, spinal, and epidural anesthesia in 44 Veterans Administration Medical Centers. Outcome measures included all cause mortality within the 30 days after the index procedure and 21 major morbidities.
RESULTS: Eighty-three thousand nine hundred fifty-eight cases meeting inclusion criteria were entered in the study between October 1, 1991 and December 31, 1993. Ninety-seven percent of patients were men, with a mean age of 60.1 +/- 13.6 (standard deviation) years. The most common preoperative risk factors were smoking (40.7 percent) and hypertension (36.1 percent). Of the patients, 84.6 percent had one or more risk factors. The most common procedures were transurethral resection of the prostate gland (6.7 percent), total knee replacement (3.1 percent), thromboendarterectomy (2.4 percent), partial colectomy (2.2 percent), and total hip replacement (2 percent). The unadjusted mortality rate was 3.1 percent at 30 days. The most common postoperative morbidities were pneumonia (3.6 percent), urinary tract infection (3.5 percent), and failure to wean from the ventilator at 48 hours postoperatively (3.2 percent). Seventeen percent of the patients have one or more major complications.
CONCLUSIONS: The Veterans Health Administration has successfully implemented an outcome reporting system for major surgery that prospectively collects patient risk and outcome information reliably and validly. Risk adjustment models and comparative hospital-specific rates of risk-adjusted outcomes are currently being developed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7749526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  109 in total

1.  Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations: results from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  S F Khuri; J Daley; W Henderson; K Hur; M Hossain; D Soybel; K W Kizer; J B Aust; R H Bell; V Chong; J Demakis; P J Fabri; J O Gibbs; F Grover; K Hammermeister; G McDonald; E Passaro; L Phillips; F Scamman; J Spencer; J F Stremple
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Odyssey of an academic surgeon.

Authors:  J B Aust
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Smoking and outcomes after knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  Preoperative factors and early complications associated with hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Christopher P Miller; Rafael A Buerba; Michael P Leslie
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2014-06

5.  Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a multicenter, prospective, risk-adjusted analysis from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Matthew M Hutter; Sheldon Randall; Shukri F Khuri; William G Henderson; William M Abbott; Andrew L Warshaw
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  The Leapfrog volume criteria may fall short in identifying high-quality surgical centers.

Authors:  Caprice K Christian; Michael L Gustafson; Rebecca A Betensky; Jennifer Daley; Michael J Zinner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Racial differences in short-term surgical outcomes following surgery for diverticulitis.

Authors:  Karim Alavi; J A Cervera-Servin; Paul R Sturrock; W B Sweeney; Justin A Maykel
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Use of the WHO surgical safety checklist in trauma and orthopaedic patients.

Authors:  Mathew Sewell; Miriam Adebibe; Prakash Jayakumar; Charlie Jowett; Kin Kong; Krishna Vemulapalli; Brian Levack
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Thirty-day morbidity and mortality of the laparoscopic ileal interposition associated with sleeve gastrectomy for the treatment of type 2 diabetic patients with BMI <35: an analysis of 454 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Aureo L DePaula; Alessandro Stival; Alfredo Halpern; Sergio Vencio
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Risk factors for adverse outcomes after the surgical treatment of appendicitis in adults.

Authors:  Julie A Margenthaler; Walter E Longo; Katherine S Virgo; Frank E Johnson; Charles A Oprian; William G Henderson; Jennifer Daley; Shukri F Khuri
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.