Literature DB >> 12191734

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 550 procedures.

Bertrand Guillonneau1, Xavier Cathelineau, Jean-Dominique Doublet, Hervé Baumert, Guy Vallancien.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate our experience in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1998 and December 2000, 550 consecutive patients eligible for radical prostatectomy, were operated laparoscopically. Data concerning surgery and post-operative course were assessed and recorded. Oncological data were assessed by pathological examination and post-operative PSA level. Functional results were assessed with a self-questionnaire.
RESULTS: The mean operating time was 170 min for the last 350 patients. Surgical conversion was necessary in seven patients (1.3%). Mean intra-operative bleeding was 290 ml (range: 50-1500 ml) for the last 350 patients. The overall transfusion rate was 5.27%. Mean bladder catheterization time was 4.2 days and median postoperative stay was 5 days in the last 350 patients. By pathological stage, 4 pT2a specimens (3.3%), 48 pT2b specimens (15%), 21 pT3a specimens (33%), 19 pT3b specimens (47%) were found to have positive surgical margins. For pT2a and pT2b stages, non-biological recurrence probability (PSA<0.1 ng/ml) is, respectively, 92.3% at 36 months, and 86.3% at 31 months. The continence rate (no pad) was 82.3% at 12 months among the 255 first patients. For 47 consecutive selected patients, spontaneous erection rate was 85 and 66% experienced spontaneous intercourse.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is currently feasible, with low perioperative morbidity. Taking into account the postoperative follow-up, oncological results are identical to those obtained with conventional surgery. The functional results are encouraging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12191734     DOI: 10.1016/s1040-8428(02)00024-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol        ISSN: 1040-8428            Impact factor:   6.312


  24 in total

Review 1.  [Functional results of various surgical techniques for radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  U Michl; M Graefen; J Noldus; T Eggert; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: The European and US Experience.

Authors:  Julia Finkelstein; Elisabeth Eckersberger; Helen Sadri; Samir S Taneja; Herbert Lepor; Bob Djavan
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2010

Review 3.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: review and assessment of an emerging technique.

Authors:  J B Basillote; T E Ahlering; D W Skarecky; D I Lee; R V Clayman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Intensive laparoscopic training: the impact of a simplified pelvic-trainer model for the urethrovesical anastomosis on the learning curve.

Authors:  Vassilis Poulakis; Ulrich Witzsch; Rachelle De Vries; Wolfgang Dillenburg; Matthias Moeckel; Eduard Becht
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter?

Authors:  T R Herrmann; R Rabenalt; J U Stolzenburg; E N Liatsikos; F Imkamp; H Tezval; A J Gross; U Jonas; M Burchardt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Francois Rozet; Justin Harmon; Xavier Cathelineau; Eric Barret; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Impact of surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted) on pathological and biochemical outcomes following radical prostatectomy: an analysis using propensity score matching.

Authors:  Ahmed Magheli; Mark L Gonzalgo; Li-Ming Su; Thomas J Guzzo; George Netto; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Misop Han; Alan W Partin; Christian P Pavlovich
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Oncological and functional outcomes of 722 robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) cases: The largest Canadian 5-year experience.

Authors:  Côme Tholomier; Marc Bienz; Pierre-Alain Hueber; Quoc Dien Trinh; Assaad El Hakim; Naif Alhathal; Thierry Lebeau; Serge Benayoun; Roger Valdivieso; Dan Liberman; Fred Saad; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Hugues Widmer; Louis Begin; Mathieu Latour; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 9.  Prevalence of post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction and a review of the recommended therapeutic modalities.

Authors:  Thiago Fernandes Negris Lima; Joshua Bitran; Fabio Stefano Frech; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.896

10.  Impact of posterior urethral plate repair on continence following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Isaac Yi Kim; Eun A Hwang; Chinedu Mmeje; Matthew Ercolani; Dong Hyeon Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.