Literature DB >> 12189531

The effect of modulation of glutathione cellular content on busulphan-induced cytotoxicity on hematopoietic cells in vitro and in vivo.

Z Hassan1, E Hellström-Lindberg, S Alsadi, M Edgren, H Hägglund, M Hassan.   

Abstract

Busulphan is used in conditioning regimens prior to SCT. A relationship between exposure to busulphan, expressed as an area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC), and effect and/or adverse effects, such as veno-occlusive disease (VOD), was reported. Exhaustion of glutathione (GSH) contributes to VOD and modulation of intracellular levels of GSH influences bulsulphan-induced toxicity in hepatocytes. Thus, increase of GSH might serve as prophylaxis against VOD. However, it should not interfere with the myeloablative effects of busulphan. We investigated the relationship between exposure to busulphan, and its in vitro toxicity to CD34(+) hematopoietic progenitors from volunteers using clonogenic assays. Busulphan inhibited colony formation by CD34(+) cells in an AUC-dependent manner. Myeloid progenitors were more sensitive than erythroid progenitors, expressed as 100% inhibition of colony formation (68.7 +/- 7.5 microg.h/ml and 140.3 +/- 35.7, respectively). The observed exposure corresponds to the total AUC obtained in patients treated with busulphan (1 mg/kg/day) for 4 days. Secondly, we studied the effect of modulation of GSH cellular levels on busulphan-induced toxicity in vitro in CD34(+) cells from volunteers, and in vivo in bone marrow cells from Balb/c mice. The intracellular concentration of GSH was increased or decreased by treatment with N-acetylcysteine or buthionine sulfoximine, respectively. Neither in vitro nor in vivo treatment with GSH modulators affected the hematological toxicity of busulphan. Thus, N-acetylcysteine would not interfere with the myeloablative effect of busulphan and therefore it is a potential candidate for VOD prophylaxis during busulphan-based conditioning regimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12189531     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  15 in total

1.  Prophylactic effect of bacteriophages on mice subjected to chemotherapy-induced immunosuppression and bone marrow transplant upon infection with Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Michał Zimecki; Jolanta Artym; Maja Kocieba; Beata Weber-Dabrowska; Jan Borysowski; Andrzej Górski
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Busulfan-Melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma or Ewing sarcoma: an exposed-unexposed study evaluating the clinical impact of the order of drug administration.

Authors:  M E Dourthe; N Ternès; D Gajda; A Paci; C Dufour; E Benhamou; D Valteau-Couanet
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Targeted busulfan-based reduced-intensity conditioning and HLA-matched HSCT cure hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.

Authors:  Matthias Felber; Colin G Steward; Karim Kentouche; Anders Fasth; Robert F Wynn; Ulrike Zeilhofer; Veronika Haunerdinger; Benjamin Volkmer; Seraina Prader; Bernd Gruhn; Stephan Ehl; Kai Lehmberg; Daniel Müller; Andrew R Gennery; Michael H Albert; Fabian Hauck; Kanchan Rao; Paul Veys; Moustapha Hassan; Arjan C Lankester; Jana Pachlopnik Schmid; Mathias M Hauri-Hohl; Tayfun Güngör
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-05-12

Review 4.  Progress on the study of the mechanism of busulfan cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Xiaoli Chen; Mingyuan Liang; Dong Wang
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 2.058

5.  A prospective randomized trial comparing cyclosporine/methotrexate and tacrolimus/sirolimus as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Johan Törlén; Olle Ringdén; Karin Garming-Legert; Per Ljungman; Jacek Winiarski; Kari Remes; Maija Itälä-Remes; Mats Remberger; Jonas Mattsson
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 6.  Review of the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Intravenous Busulfan in Paediatric Patients.

Authors:  Rachael Lawson; Christine E Staatz; Christopher J Fraser; Stefanie Hennig
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Haploidentical Related Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Dedicator-of-Cytokinesis 8 Deficiency Using Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  Nirali N Shah; Alexandra F Freeman; Helen Su; Kristen Cole; Mark Parta; Niki M Moutsopoulos; Safa Baris; Elif Karakoc-Aydiner; Thomas E Hughes; Heidi H Kong; Steve M Holland; Dennis D Hickstein
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Busulfan-induced senescence is dependent on ROS production upstream of the MAPK pathway.

Authors:  Virginia Probin; Yong Wang; Daohong Zhou
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 7.376

9.  Does the order of busulfan and cyclophosphamide affect allogeneic stem cell transplantation related liver toxicity?

Authors:  Keisuke Kidoguchi; Yasutaka Kuniyoshi; Yuki Kataoka
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 3.673

10.  Impact of busulfan pharmacokinetics on outcome in adult patients receiving an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  Claire Seydoux; Raphael Battegay; Joerg Halter; Dominik Heim; Katharina M Rentsch; Jakob R Passweg; Michael Medinger
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.174

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.