PURPOSE: To describe the clinical phenotype, with emphasis on the electrophysiological findings, of patients with autosomal recessive rod monochromacy (RM) and defined mutations in the CNGA3/CNGB3 genes. METHODS: RM patients from eight different families were included in the study. Their genotypes were determined by DNA sequencing and/or RFLP analysis of PCR-amplified genomic segments of the CNGA3 and CNGB3 genes. For comparison, we investigated one patient with blue-cone monochromacy (BCM). The clinical examination included best-corrected visual acuity, fundus examination, and full-field ERG. In six patients, the examination was complemented by multifocal ERG (MERG). RESULTS: Three patients had three different CNG3A genotypes. Five patients were homozygous and one patient compound heterozygous for a 1-bp deletion (1148delC) in the CNGB3 gene. All patients examined presented with a visual acuity of 0.1-0.15. Small residual cone responses were noted in four young RM patients. The oldest patient examined (age 47 years) presented with pigmentary changes in the mid-peripheral retina and concentric constrictions of the visual fields. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RM and mutations in the CNGA3/CNGB3 genes presented a similar clinical phenotype, confirming the essential function of both the alpha- and beta-subunits of the cGMP-gated cation channel in cone photoreceptor function. Small remaining cone responses in a few of the younger patients and mid-peripheral pigmentary degenerations in the oldest patient examined indicate that there could be some degree of progression in retinal dysfunction in at least some patients with RM.
PURPOSE: To describe the clinical phenotype, with emphasis on the electrophysiological findings, of patients with autosomal recessive rod monochromacy (RM) and defined mutations in the CNGA3/CNGB3 genes. METHODS: RM patients from eight different families were included in the study. Their genotypes were determined by DNA sequencing and/or RFLP analysis of PCR-amplified genomic segments of the CNGA3 and CNGB3 genes. For comparison, we investigated one patient with blue-cone monochromacy (BCM). The clinical examination included best-corrected visual acuity, fundus examination, and full-field ERG. In six patients, the examination was complemented by multifocal ERG (MERG). RESULTS: Three patients had three different CNG3A genotypes. Five patients were homozygous and one patient compound heterozygous for a 1-bp deletion (1148delC) in the CNGB3 gene. All patients examined presented with a visual acuity of 0.1-0.15. Small residual cone responses were noted in four young RM patients. The oldest patient examined (age 47 years) presented with pigmentary changes in the mid-peripheral retina and concentric constrictions of the visual fields. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with RM and mutations in the CNGA3/CNGB3 genes presented a similar clinical phenotype, confirming the essential function of both the alpha- and beta-subunits of the cGMP-gated cation channel in cone photoreceptor function. Small remaining cone responses in a few of the younger patients and mid-peripheral pigmentary degenerations in the oldest patient examined indicate that there could be some degree of progression in retinal dysfunction in at least some patients with RM.
Authors: Mieke M C Bijveld; Frans C C Riemslag; Astrid M L Kappers; Frank P Hoeben; Maria M van Genderen Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2011-09-27 Impact factor: 2.379
Authors: Bo Chang; Tanja Grau; Susann Dangel; Ron Hurd; Bernhard Jurklies; E Cumhur Sener; Sten Andreasson; Helene Dollfus; Britta Baumann; Sylvia Bolz; Nikolai Artemyev; Susanne Kohl; John Heckenlively; Bernd Wissinger Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-11-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Anna E C Molnar; Sten O L Andreasson; Eva K B Larsson; Hanna M Åkerblom; Gerd E Holmström Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2015-10-18 Impact factor: 2.379
Authors: Jianhua Xu; Lynsie M Morris; Stylianos Michalakis; Martin Biel; Steven J Fliesler; David M Sherry; Xi-Qin Ding Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Anne Moskowitz; Ronald M Hansen; James D Akula; Susan E Eklund; Anne B Fulton Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-09-29 Impact factor: 4.799