Literature DB >> 12185396

Citalopram dose-response revisited using an alternative psychometric approach to evaluate clinical effects of four fixed citalopram doses compared to placebo in patients with major depression.

P Bech1, P Tanghøj, H F Andersen, K Overø.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Among the many problems in interpreting dose-response studies with antidepressants are the psychometric problems in the identification of true antidepressive effect versus true adverse drug effect.
OBJECTIVES: This study is a re-examination of a dose-response trial with citalopram in order to examine the explanatory ability of using strict psychometric dimensions to measure the wanted and unwanted drug effects of different doses compared to placebo.
METHODS: The antidepressive response was measured after 2 and 6 weeks of therapy with the depression subscales of the HAM-D and on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS). The patient-reported Symptom Checklist (SCL) sub-scales for depression and anxiety were also examined. Subjective side-effects were measured on serotonin-specific items of the SCL. Effect size statistics were used to measure the antidepressive effect (an effect size of 0.30 equals a drug superiority over placebo of 15-20%). Side effects were statistically analysed using baseline-adjusted scores of the individual symptoms.
RESULTS: The psychometric analysis of the outcome scales showed that the full HAM-D(17), the SCL-56 and the SCL side-effect subscale were multidimensional scales, while the HAM-D and MADRS subscales as well as the SCL-anxiety subscale were most homogeneous, indicating that their total scores are sufficient statistics. When the scales were used as well as the individual serotonin-specific SCL side-effect symptoms, the results showed that after 2 weeks of therapy a clinical response (effect side over 0.30) was only seen for the SCL-anxiety subscale in the citalopram doses of 40 mg and 60 mg daily. After 6 weeks of therapy response to even 10 mg and 20 mg was seen in the HAM-D and MADRS subscales and in the SCL-anxiety subscale, however, with lower effect sizes than found for 40 mg and 60 mg citalopram daily. The dose of 20 mg citalopram induced side-effects comparable with those seen for 40 mg and 60 mg, while 10 mg was not different from placebo. This was further confirmed by the fact that more patients dropped out on 20 mg than on 10 mg citalopram daily, due to adverse events.
CONCLUSION: This psychometric re-examination of a citalopram dose-response trial has shown that the pure antidepressive or antianxiety effects can be observed after 6 weeks of therapy even in a dose of 10 mg daily. However, both 10 mg and 20 mg daily had lower effect sizes than 40 mg and 60 mg daily. At a dose level of 20 mg daily, side effects are more pronounced initially than at 10 mg daily; this should be taken into account clinically when evaluating the overall benefit of the drug. For a highly serotonin-specific drug such as citalopram, both wanted and unwanted effects are dose-related.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12185396     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-002-1147-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  22 in total

1.  Sensitivity to changes during antidepressant treatment: a comparison of unidimensional subscales of the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C) and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) in patients with mild major, minor or subsyndromal depression.

Authors:  Isabella Helmreich; Stefanie Wagner; Roland Mergl; Antje-Kathrin Allgaier; Martin Hautzinger; Verena Henkel; Ulrich Hegerl; André Tadić
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  Antidepressant response to chronic citalopram treatment in eight inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Jianwei Jiao; Angela M Nitzke; Demetrios G Doukas; Mariel P Seiglie; Stephanie C Dulawa
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Social functioning: should it become an endpoint in trials of antidepressants?

Authors:  Per Bech
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.749

4.  Efficacy of escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder compared with conventional selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine XR: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sidney H Kennedy; Henning F Andersen; Raymond W Lam
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.186

5.  Serotoninergic effects on judgments and social learning of trustworthiness.

Authors:  Arndis Simonsen; Jørgen Scheel-Krüger; Mads Jensen; Andreas Roepstorff; Arne Møller; Chris D Frith; Daniel Campbell-Meiklejohn
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Dose-response relationship of duloxetine in placebo-controlled clinical trials in patients with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Per Bech; Daniel K Kajdasz; Vibeke Porsdal
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Controlling for drug dose in systematic review and meta-analysis: a case study of the effect of antidepressant dose.

Authors:  Richard A Hansen; Charity G Moore; Stacie B Dusetzina; Brian I Leinwand; Gerald Gartlehner; Bradley N Gaynes
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 8.  Reboxetine for acute treatment of major depression: systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished placebo and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor controlled trials.

Authors:  Dirk Eyding; Monika Lelgemann; Ulrich Grouven; Martin Härter; Mandy Kromp; Thomas Kaiser; Michaela F Kerekes; Martin Gerken; Beate Wieseler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-10-12

9.  Sex Differences in Reported Adverse Drug Reactions of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors.

Authors:  Corine Ekhart; Florence van Hunsel; Joep Scholl; Sieta de Vries; Eugene van Puijenbroek
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Prediction of clinical response based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models of 5-hydroxytryptamine reuptake inhibitors in mice.

Authors:  M Kreilgaard; D G Smith; L T Brennum; C Sánchez
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 8.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.