Literature DB >> 12184783

Substrate recognition by a family of uracil-DNA glycosylases: UNG, MUG, and TDG.

Pingfang Liu1, Artur Burdzy, Lawrence C Sowers.   

Abstract

In response to continuous hydrolytic and oxidative DNA damage, cells of all organisms have a complex network of repair systems that recognize, remove, and rebuild the injured sites. Damaged pyrimidines are generally removed by glycosylases that must scan the entire genome to locate lesions with sufficient fidelity to selectively remove the damage without inadvertent removal of normal bases. We report here studies conducted with a series of base analogues designed to test mechanisms of base recognition suggested by structural studies of glycosylase complexes. The oligonucleotide series examined here includes 5-halouracils with increasing substituent size and purine analogues placed opposite the target uracil with hydrogen, amino, and keto substituents in the 2- and 6-positions. The glycosylases studied here include Escherichia coli uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG), E. coli mismatch uracil-DNA glycosylase (MUG), and the Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum mismatch thymine-DNA glycosylase (TDG). The results of this study suggest that these glycosylases utilize several strategies for base identification, including (1) steric limitations on the size of the 5-substituent, (2) electronic-inductive properties of the 5-substituent, (3) reduced thermal stability of mispairs, and (4) specific functional groups on the purine base in the opposing strand. Contrary to predictions based upon the crystal structure, the preference of MUG for mispaired uracil over thymine is not based upon steric exclusion. Furthermore, the preference for mispaired uracil over uracil paired with adenine is more likely due to reduced thermal stability as opposed to specific recognition of the mispaired guanine. On the other hand, TDG, which exhibits modest discrimination among various pyrimidines, shows strong interactions with functional groups present on the purine opposite the target pyrimidine. These results provide new insights into the mechanisms of base selection by DNA repair glycosylases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12184783     DOI: 10.1021/tx020030a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol        ISSN: 0893-228X            Impact factor:   3.739


  23 in total

1.  DNA ligases ensure fidelity by interrogating minor groove contacts.

Authors:  Pingfang Liu; Artur Burdzy; Lawrence C Sowers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Detection of uracil within DNA using a sensitive labeling method for in vitro and cellular applications.

Authors:  Gergely Róna; Ildikó Scheer; Kinga Nagy; Hajnalka L Pálinkás; Gergely Tihanyi; Máté Borsos; Angéla Békési; Beáta G Vértessy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  The curious chemical biology of cytosine: deamination, methylation, and oxidation as modulators of genomic potential.

Authors:  Christopher S Nabel; Sara A Manning; Rahul M Kohli
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 5.100

4.  Mechanisms of base selection by the Escherichia coli mispaired uracil glycosylase.

Authors:  Pingfang Liu; Jacob A Theruvathu; Agus Darwanto; Victoria Valinluck Lao; Tod Pascal; William Goddard; Lawrence C Sowers
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-01-20       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Uracil-DNA glycosylases-structural and functional perspectives on an essential family of DNA repair enzymes.

Authors:  N Schormann; R Ricciardi; D Chattopadhyay
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Characterization of DNA glycosylase activity by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Agus Darwanto; Alvin Farrel; Daniel K Rogstad; Lawrence C Sowers
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 3.365

7.  Uracil DNA glycosylase activity on nucleosomal DNA depends on rotational orientation of targets.

Authors:  Hope A Cole; Jenna M Tabor-Godwin; Jeffrey J Hayes
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Base pairing configuration and stability of an oligonucleotide duplex containing a 5-chlorouracil-adenine base pair.

Authors:  Jacob A Theruvathu; Cherine H Kim; Daniel K Rogstad; Jonathan W Neidigh; Lawrence C Sowers
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  pH-Dependent configurations of a 5-chlorouracil-guanine base pair.

Authors:  Jacob A Theruvathu; Cherine H Kim; Agus Darwanto; Jonathan W Neidigh; Lawrence C Sowers
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  An HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry method for simultaneous detection of alkylated base excision repair products.

Authors:  Elwood A Mullins; Emily H Rubinson; Kevin N Pereira; M Wade Calcutt; Plamen P Christov; Brandt F Eichman
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 3.608

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.