Literature DB >> 12183352

Can segregation within the semantic system account for category-specific deficits?

Jacqueline A Phillips1, Uta Noppeney, Glyn W Humphreys, Cathy J Price.   

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging was used to investigate the extent to which category-specific semantic deficits in patients can be accounted for in terms of the demands placed on neural systems underlying different types of semantic knowledge. Unlike previous functional imaging studies of category specificity, we used a factorial design that crossed category (tools and fruits) with tasks requiring retrieval of either action or perceptual (real life size) knowledge. The presentation of tools relative to fruit increased activation in the same left posterior middle temporal area that was linked to the retrieval of action knowledge in general (for fruit as well as tools). However, we found no correlation between activation evoked by fruit and the size retrieval task. The left medial anterior temporal cortex was the only region to be activated for fruit relative to tools. We argue that the sensory-functional theory of category-specific effects is insufficient to account for the current neuroimaging literature. However, the data do support a more refined version of the theory: tools, relative to fruit, are more strongly linked to manipulative/motor knowledge and, for some tasks, fruit may be more reliant on integrating multiple semantic features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12183352     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awf215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  20 in total

1.  Imaging a cognitive model of apraxia: the neural substrate of gesture-specific cognitive processes.

Authors:  Philippe Peigneux; Martial Van der Linden; Gaetan Garraux; Steven Laureys; Christian Degueldre; Joel Aerts; Guy Del Fiore; Gustave Moonen; Andre Luxen; Eric Salmon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Development of brain mechanisms for processing orthographic and phonologic representations.

Authors:  James R Booth; Douglas D Burman; Joel R Meyer; Darren R Gitelman; Todd B Parrish; M Marsel Mesulam
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Impact of the virtual reality on the neural representation of an environment.

Authors:  Emmanuel Mellet; Laetitia Laou; Laurent Petit; Laure Zago; Bernard Mazoyer; Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The Neural Representations of Movement across Semantic Categories.

Authors:  Valentina Borghesani; Marianna Riello; Benno Gesierich; Valentina Brentari; Alessia Monti; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Exploring commonalities across participants in the neural representation of objects.

Authors:  Svetlana V Shinkareva; Vicente L Malave; Marcel Adam Just; Tom M Mitchell
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Is moral beauty different from facial beauty? Evidence from an fMRI study.

Authors:  Tingting Wang; Lei Mo; Ce Mo; Li Hai Tan; Jonathan S Cant; Luojin Zhong; Gerald Cupchik
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 7.  For a cognitive neuroscience of concepts: Moving beyond the grounding issue.

Authors:  Anna Leshinskaya; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

8.  Transformation of Event Representations along Middle Temporal Gyrus.

Authors:  Anna Leshinskaya; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Category-related activation for written words in the posterior fusiform is task specific.

Authors:  Joseph T Devlin; Matthew F S Rushworth; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  The role of the posterior superior temporal sulcus in audiovisual processing.

Authors:  Julia Hocking; Cathy J Price
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.