Literature DB >> 12182460

Natural anti-galactose alpha1,3 galactose antibodies delay, but do not prevent the acceptance of extracellular matrix xenografts.

Roberta H Raeder1, Stephen F Badylak, Christine Sheehan, Bhaskar Kallakury, Dennis W Metzger.   

Abstract

Naturally occurring antibodies to the galactose alpha1,3 galactose (alpha gal) epitope expressed on xenogeneic grafts are a major barrier to organ transplantation in humans. Porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) expresses the alpha gal epitope and is currently being used as a bioscaffold for tissue remodeling. To examine in detail the potential role of the alpha gal epitope in immune recognition of this acellular, avascular biomaterial, we have used mice which have a genetic disruption in the alpha1,3 galactosyltransferase gene (alpha gal(-/-)mice) and thus express natural anti-alpha gal antibodies in a manner similar to humans. It was found that alpha gal(-/-)mice produced IgM anti-alpha gal antibodies in addition to IgG1 SIS-specific antibodies, which did not bind to the alpha gal epitope. Histological examination of implant sites demonstrated an early inflammatory response that consisted predominantly of neutrophils in both alpha gal(+/+) and alpha gal(-/-)mice. However, while alpha gal(+/+)mice completely remodeled SIS implants by day 25, alpha gal(-/-)mice still exhibited some visible SIS together with inflammatory cellular infiltrates at this time point. Nevertheless, by day 35, the implant site in alpha gal(-/-)mice appeared to be entirely remodeled although a few acute inflammatory cells were still present. Immunization of alpha gal(-/-)mice with sheep erythrocytes to enhance anti-alpha gal antibody levels led to a more robust early inflammatory response following implantation but did not change the ultimate fate of the graft. We conclude that, in contrast to xenotransplantation of whole organs, naturally-occurring anti-alpha gal antibodies do not influence the ability of xenogeneic extracellular matrices to serve as bioscaffolds for tissue remodeling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12182460     DOI: 10.1016/s0966-3274(01)00044-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Immunol        ISSN: 0966-3274            Impact factor:   1.708


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of three methods for the derivation of a biologic scaffold composed of adipose tissue extracellular matrix.

Authors:  Bryan N Brown; John M Freund; Li Han; J Peter Rubin; Janet E Reing; Eric M Jeffries; Mathew T Wolf; Stephen Tottey; Christopher A Barnes; Buddy D Ratner; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 2.  Immune response to biologic scaffold materials.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak; Thomas W Gilbert
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 11.130

3.  Healing of the goat anterior cruciate ligament after a new suture repair technique and bioscaffold treatment.

Authors:  D Tan Nguyen; Jurre Geel; Martin Schulze; Michael J Raschke; Savio L-Y Woo; C Niek van Dijk; Leendert Blankevoort
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Assembly and testing of stem cell-seeded layered collagen constructs for heart valve tissue engineering.

Authors:  Mary E Tedder; Agneta Simionescu; Joseph Chen; Jun Liao; Dan T Simionescu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 5.  Liver bioengineering: from the stage of liver decellularized matrix to the multiple cellular actors and bioreactor special effects.

Authors:  Mireia Caralt; Enrique Velasco; Angel Lanas; Pedro M Baptista
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 6.  The useful agent to have an ideal biological scaffold.

Authors:  Raziyeh Kheirjou; Jafar Soleimani Rad; Ahad Ferdowsi Khosroshahi; Leila Roshangar
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 1.522

7.  Effects of antigen removal on a porcine osteochondral xenograft for articular cartilage repair.

Authors:  Steve Elder; Hudson Chenault; Paul Gloth; Katie Webb; Ruth Recinos; Emily Wright; Dalton Moran; James Butler; Abdolsamad Borazjani; Avery Cooley
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 8.  Preparation and Characterization of Human Adipose Tissue-Derived Extracellular Matrix, Growth Factors, and Stem Cells: A Concise Review.

Authors:  So Young Chun; Jeong Ok Lim; Bongsu Jung; Tae Gyun Kwon; Eun Hye Lee; Man-Hoon Han; Yun-Sok Ha; Jun Nyung Lee; Bum Soo Kim; Min Jeong Park; MyungGu Yeo
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.169

Review 9.  Understanding roles of porcine small intestinal submucosa in urinary bladder regeneration: identification of variable regenerative characteristics of small intestinal submucosa.

Authors:  Hsueh-Kung Lin; Shirley Yezdi Godiwalla; Blake Palmer; Dominic Frimberger; Qing Yang; Sundar V Madihally; Kar-Ming Fung; Bradley P Kropp
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 10.  Comparison of methods for whole-organ decellularization in tissue engineering of bioartificial organs.

Authors:  Ming He; Anthony Callanan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 6.389

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.