Literature DB >> 12181717

Hemodynamic changes during gaseous and gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Atila Korkmaz1, Muhittin Alkiş, Okan Hamamci, Hasan Besim, Nilüfer Erverdi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The main disadvantage of gaseous laparoscopic surgery is the need for CO(2) insufflation and the elevation of intra-abdominal pressure. Gasless laparoscopic surgery is an alternative to gaseous laparoscopic surgery, which avoids the hazardous effects of pneumoperitoneum. This study was conducted to investigate the hemodynamic effects of pneumoperitoneum and to compare gasless and gaseous laparoscopic cholecystectomy on a hemodynamic basis.
METHODS: The gasless laparoscopic procedure uses an electromechanical retractor system to lift the abdominal wall. We performed 20 gaseous and 11 gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a collective total of 31 patients with symptomatic gallstones. The mean arterial pressure, heart rate, end diastolic index, systemic vascular resistance index, cardiac index (CI), ejection fraction (EF), and stroke index (SI) values were monitored noninvasively by thoracic electrical bioimpedance.
RESULTS: In the gaseous group, statistically significant changes were detected in CI, EF, and SI values after insufflation as compared to the values before pneumoperitoneum. In the gasless group, only minimal changes were detected in the SI values, which were not significant.
CONCLUSION: Gasless laparoscopy has little effect on the hemodynamic parameters of patients and provides an alternative to the gaseous technique in selected cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12181717     DOI: 10.1007/s005950200127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  5 in total

1.  ["Does minimally invasive surgery really imply minimally invasive anaesthesia?"].

Authors:  T Koch; R J Litz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Vacuum-assisted abdominal wall lift for minimal-access surgery: a porcine model study.

Authors:  T E Udwadia; B K Kathrani; W Bernie; U S Gadgil; V M Chariar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Evaluation of hemodynamic changes using different intra-abdominal pressures for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Asif Umar; Kuldeep Singh Mehta; Nandita Mehta
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 4.  Low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Monica Ortenzi; Giulia Montori; Alberto Sartori; Andrea Balla; Emanuele Botteri; Giacomo Piatto; Gaetano Gallo; Silvia Vigna; Mario Guerrieri; Sophie Williams; Mauro Podda; Ferdinando Agresta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.453

5.  Effects of different plasma target concentrations of remifentanil on the MACBAR of sevoflurane in children with laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Dan Wang; Juan Xu; Xiao-Lin Yang; Yan-Xia Guo; Ping-Ping Jiang; Guo-Yuan Zhang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 2.217

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.