Literature DB >> 24426454

Evaluation of hemodynamic changes using different intra-abdominal pressures for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Asif Umar1, Kuldeep Singh Mehta2, Nandita Mehta3.   

Abstract

Biliary diseases known since ages constitute major portion of digestive tract disorders world over. Among these cholelithiasis being the fore runner causing general ill health, thereby requiring surgical intervention for total cure. The study was undertaken in an attempt to compare the hemodynamic changes in patient undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using different intra-abdominal pressures created due to carbon dioxide insufflation. The patients were randomly allocated to one of the three groups in which different levels of intra-abdominal pressures (8-10 mmHg,11-13 mmHg and 14 mmHg and above) were maintained. The base line parameters monitored were heart rate, non invasive blood pressur(systolic and mean)and end tidal carbon dioxide. All the parameters were monitored at various intervals i.e. Immediately during insufflation, 5 min, 10 min, 20 min, 30 min after CO2 insufflation and after every 10 min if surgery exceeds 30 min, at exsufflation,10 min after CO2 exsufflation. Patients were ventilated with Pedius Drager Ventilator keeping tidal volume 8-10 ml/kg and respiratory rate 12-14 breaths/min. During surgery patients were placed in reverse Trendlenburg position (head up) at 15 °. The results obtained were evaluated statistically and analyzed. Baseline characteristics were found to be comparable. Hemodynamic variables were reported as mean and standard deviation. Statistical significance among groups was evaluated using Analysis of Variance and unpaired student t test (two tailed). Inter-group comparisons were made using Bonferroni test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. In all the three groups the mean heart rate (baseline 84.08 ± 12.50, 87.96 ± 15.73 and 86.92 ± 17.00 respectively) increased during CO2 insufflation and the rise in heart rate continued till exsufflation after which it decreased and at 10 min after exsufflation the heart rates were comparable with the baseline. The inter-group comparison of mean heart rate between I &amp; III was statistically significant at 10, 20, 30 min after CO2 insufflation which continued at exsufflation and 10 min after CO2 exsufflation [p < 0.05]. The inter-group comparison between I &amp; III showed statistically significant difference in systolic blood pressure at 10, 20, 30 min after CO2 insufflation, at exsufflation and 10 min after exsufflation [p = 0.0001] and mean arterial pressure at 5, 10, 20, 30 min after CO2 insufflation, at exsufflation and 10 min after exsufflation [p = 0.0001]. Comparison between Group I and Group III &amp; between Group II and Group III showed highly significant statistical difference in EtCO2 immediately after insufflation and the same trend was seen till the completion of surgery and even 10 min after exsufflation [p = 0.001]. The conclusion drawn from the study was that laparoscopic cholecystectomy induces significant hemodynamic changes intraoperatively, the majority of pathophysiological changes are related to cardiovascular system and are caused by CO2 insufflation .A high intra-abdominal pressure due to CO2 insufflation is associated with more fluctuations in hemodynamic parameters and increased peritoneal absorption of CO2 as compared to low intraabdominal pressure so low pressure pneumoperitoneum is feasible for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and minimizes the adverse hemodynamic effects of CO2 insufflation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hemodynamic; Insufflation; Intra-abdominal pressure; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Year:  2012        PMID: 24426454      PMCID: PMC3726806          DOI: 10.1007/s12262-012-0484-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN: 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


  16 in total

1.  Coelioscopic cholecystectomy. Preliminary report of 36 cases.

Authors:  F Dubois; P Icard; G Berthelot; H Levard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Anesthesia for a patient undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A P Marco; C J Yeo; P Rock
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  End-tidal carbon dioxide tension during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Correlation with the baseline value prior to carbon dioxide insufflation.

Authors:  A Baraka; S Jabbour; R Hammoud; M Aouad; F Najjar; G Khoury; A Sibai
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Transoesophageal echocardiographic assessment of haemodynamic function during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A J Cunningham; J Turner; S Rosenbaum; T Rafferty
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Hemodynamic and respiratory changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy with high and reduced intraabdominal pressure.

Authors:  A S Rishimani; S C Gautam
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1996-06

6.  Acid-base balance during laparoscopy. The effects of intraperitoneal insufflation of carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide on acid-base balance during controlled ventilation.

Authors:  R Magno; A Medegård; R Bengtsson; S E Tronstad
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.636

7.  Laparoscopic approach to pheochromocytoma: is a lower intraabdominal pressure helpful?

Authors:  Jayashree Sood; Lakshmi Jayaraman; Ved P Kumra; Pradeep K Chowbey
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy monitored with transesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  D A Dorsay; F L Greene; C L Baysinger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: anesthetic implications.

Authors:  A J Cunningham; S J Brull
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 10.  Circulatory and respiratory complications of carbon dioxide insufflation.

Authors:  C N Gutt; T Oniu; A Mehrabi; P Schemmer; A Kashfi; T Kraus; M W Büchler
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 2.588

View more
  10 in total

1.  Is the use of ultra-low insufflation pressure safe and feasible in robot assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Christopher Johnstone; Jack Hammond; Vishwanath Hanchanale
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2021-05

Review 2.  What is the evidence for the use of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum? A systematic review.

Authors:  Denise M D Özdemir-van Brunschot; Kees C J H M van Laarhoven; Gert-Jan Scheffer; Sjaak Pouwels; Kim E Wever; Michiel C Warlé
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Thoracic combined spinal epidural anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Nandita Mehta; Mohd Reidwan Dar; Shikha Sharma; Kuldeep Singh Mehta
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

4.  Comparison of the impact of prolonged low-pressure and standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum on myocardial injury after robot-assisted surgery in the Trendelenburg position: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Xixue Zhang; Jionglin Wei; Xiaoxing Song; Yuhao Zhang; Weiqing Qian; Lu Sheng; Zhoujun Shen; Lvjun Yang; Rong Dong; Weidong Gu
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Changes in Hematological Parameters and Liver Enzymes During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Adam Umair Ashraf Butt; Ahsan Sajjad; Abdur Rehman Malik; Ahmad Farooq; Qasim Ali; Zuhair Ali Rizvi; Muhammad Sarfraz Khan; Muhammad Anwar
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-02-03

6.  The impact of the last ten minutes of surgery on hemorrhagic complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Case-control study.

Authors:  Michał R Janik; Mateusz Czado; Konrad Kosiński; Szymon Grochans; Maciej Walędziak; Piotr Kowalewski; Andrzej Kwiatkowski
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 1.195

7.  Comparative evaluation of optic nerve sheath diameter in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using low and standard pressures of gas insufflations.

Authors:  Vikas Saini; Tanvir Samra; Sameer Sethi; B Naveen Naik
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-12-03

Review 8.  Low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Monica Ortenzi; Giulia Montori; Alberto Sartori; Andrea Balla; Emanuele Botteri; Giacomo Piatto; Gaetano Gallo; Silvia Vigna; Mario Guerrieri; Sophie Williams; Mauro Podda; Ferdinando Agresta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.453

9.  The assessment of the effect of different intraabdominal pressures used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery on optic nerve sheath diameter: a prospective observational cohort study

Authors:  Tuna Ertürk; Bülent Barış Güven; Yadigar Yılmaz; Fulya Yurtsever; Ayşın Ersoy
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 0.973

10.  Maintaining Optimal Surgical Conditions With Low Insufflation Pressures is Possible With Deep Neuromuscular Blockade During Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Myoung Hwa Kim; Ki Young Lee; Kang-Young Lee; Byung-Soh Min; Young Chul Yoo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.