Literature DB >> 12181469

Chlamydia trachomatis in non-gonococcal urethritis patients and their heterosexual partners: routine testing by polymerase chain reaction.

I A Tait1, C A Hart.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify the proportion of cases of non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU) in which Chlamydia trachomatis was detected in patients and their partners, using DNA amplification testing; and to relate the importance of age and symptoms to the presence of chlamydial infection and so clarify the aetiology and epidemiology of NGU, with a view to reducing the prevalence of chlamydial infection in general.
METHODS: A 6 month cohort of all newly registered heterosexual men diagnosed with NGU, shortly after the introduction of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) chlamydial testing in 1997, was reviewed, with particular reference to their age and presence of symptoms; where possible, their women partners' data were traced.
RESULTS: Of 283 NGU patients, 35% were chlamydia positive and significantly younger than the chlamydia negative cases (mean ages 25 and 29 years respectively). 51% NGU patients were symptomatic, of whom 40% were chlamydia positive. 43% of all chlamydia positive NGU patients were asymptomatic. 36 men had had chlamydia positive index partners. 26% of the 97 secondary female contacts were chlamydia positive; three had had a negative male partner. From 155 men (28% chlamydia positive) no contacts were traceable.
CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with a previous similar study in 1987-90, using less sensitive diagnostic methods, a higher rate of chlamydial infection in NGU was detected. Young age and the presence of symptoms were confirmed as important factors for chlamydial positivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12181469      PMCID: PMC1744493          DOI: 10.1136/sti.78.4.286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  7 in total

1.  Is the urethral smear necessary in asymptomatic men attending a genitourinary medicine clinic?

Authors:  M Shahmanesh; K W Radcliffe
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Asymptomatic men: should they be tested for urethritis?

Authors:  Paddy Horner
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.519

3.  Genotype-Specific Concordance of Chlamydia trachomatis Genital Infection Within Heterosexual Partnerships.

Authors:  Julia A Schillinger; Barry P Katz; Lauri E Markowitz; Phillip G Braslins; Lydia A Shrier; Guillermo Madico; Barbara Van Der Pol; Donald P Orr; Peter A Rice; Byron E Batteiger
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Chlamydia trachomatis serovar distribution and other concurrent sexually transmitted infections in heterosexual men with urethritis in Italy.

Authors:  M Donati; A Di Francesco; A D'Antuono; S Pignanelli; A Shurdhi; A Moroni; R Baldelli; R Cevenini
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence in men in the mid-west of Ireland.

Authors:  J Powell; C O'Connor; M O'hlarlaithe; J Saunders; J De Freitas
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 6.  The Role of the Immune Response in Chlamydia trachomatis Infection of the Male Genital Tract: A Double-Edged Sword.

Authors:  Kate A Redgrove; Eileen A McLaughlin
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 7.  Mycoplasma genitalium: an emerging sexually transmitted pathogen.

Authors:  Sunil Sethi; Gagandeep Singh; Palash Samanta; Meera Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.375

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.