Literature DB >> 12175375

Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. part I: a longitudinal clinical evaluation.

Ignace Naert1, George Koutsikakis, Joke Duyck, Marc Quirynen, Reinhilde Jacobs, Daniel van Steenberghe.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to predict the outcome of implant restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism, taking into account implant interdependency and the effect of several confounding variables. Between December 1982 and June 1998, 1956 Brånemark system implants (1212 and 744 in the maxilla and mandible, respectively, 846 distal to first premolars) were installed in 660 patients (248 males) at the Department of Periodontology of the University Hospitals of the Catholic University of Leuven. Of the 810 restorations installed at the Department of Prosthetic Dentistry of the same hospital, 235 were single crowns, 166 were supported by implants and teeth and 409 were free-standing fixed partial prostheses. An additional 87 restorations was placed in private dental offices and were not included. The patients were followed from implant installation until June 1999. The estimated cumulative survival rates were 91.4% for all implants and 95.8% for all restorations over a period of 16 years. Estimated cumulative survival rates from loading for implant-tooth connected and free-standing implants were, respectively, 93.6% and 97.2%. Neither jaw site nor implant position (anterior-posterior) had any significant effect on the outcome. Short implant length, high number of implants per patient, low number of implants per prosthesis, implants loaded by acrylic-veneered restorations and implants combined with bone grafting present a higher risk hazard for implant failure. The idea of not splinting the implants in a fixed partial prosthesis is promising but needs replication before accepting it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12175375     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130406.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  22 in total

1.  Success of dental implants in patients with large bone defect and analysis of risk factors for implant failure: a non-randomized retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Takumi Hasegawa; Aki Sasaki; Izumi Saito; Satomi Arimoto; Nanae Yatagai; Yujiro Hiraoka; Daisuke Takeda; Yasumasa Kakei; Masaya Akashi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Esthetic evaluation of maxillary single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone.

Authors:  Hae-Lyung Cho; Jae-Kwan Lee; Heung-Sik Um; Beom-Seok Chang
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 2.614

3.  Restoration-guided implant rehabilitation of the complex partial edentulism: a clinical report.

Authors:  Fotios Tzerbos; Nikitas Sykaras; Vasilios Tzoras
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2010-04-01

4.  Dental patients' awareness and knowledge in using dental implants as an option in replacing missing teeth: A survey in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Sulieman Al-Johany; Hamad A Al Zoman; Mohannad Al Juhaini; Mohannad Al Refeai
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2010-07-17

5.  A radiological evaluation of marginal bone around dental implants: An in-vivo study.

Authors:  Shikha Nandal; Pankaj Ghalaut; Himanshu Shekhawat
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Dec

6.  The effect of implant angulation and splinting on stress distribution in implant body and supporting bone: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Ebadian Behnaz; Mosharraf Ramin; Samaneh Abbasi; Memar Ardestani Pouya; Farzin Mahmood
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

7.  The effect of cigarette smoking habits on the outcome of dental implant treatment.

Authors:  Dror Twito; Paul Sade
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Survival and Success of ITI Implants and Prostheses: Retrospective Study of Cases with 5-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Bilge Gokcen-Rohlig; Mehmet Yaltirik; Senem Ozer; Ebru Demet Tuncer; Gulumser Evlioglu
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2009-01

9.  Biomechanics and load resistance of short dental implants: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Istabrak Hasan; Christoph Bourauel; Torsten Mundt; Friedhelm Heinemann
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2013-05-08

10.  Impact of a "TED-Style" presentation on potential patients' willingness to accept dental implant therapy: a one-group, pre-test post-test study.

Authors:  Henry Ghanem; Kelvin Ian Afrashtehfar; Samer Abi-Nader; Faleh Tamimi
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 1.904

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.