Literature DB >> 12173741

Intraspinal micro stimulation generates locomotor-like and feedback-controlled movements.

Vivian K Mushahwar1, Deborah M Gillard, Michel J A Gauthier, Arthur Prochazka.   

Abstract

Intraspinal microstimulation (ISMS) may provide a means for improving motor function in people suffering from spinal cord injuries, head trauma, or stroke. The goal of this study was to determine whether microstimulation of the mammalian spinal cord could generate locomotor-like stepping and feedback-controlled movements of the hindlimbs. Under pentobarbital anesthesia, 24 insulated microwires were implanted in the lumbosacral cord of three adult cats. The cats were placed in a sling leaving all limbs pendent. Bilateral alternating stepping of the hindlimbs was achieved by stimulating through as few as two electrodes in each side of the spinal cord. Typical stride lengths were 23.5 cm, and ample foot clearance was achieved during swing. Mean ground reaction force during stance was 36.4 N, sufficient for load-bearing. Feedback-controlled movements of the cat's foot were achieved by reciprocally modulating the amplitude of stimuli delivered through two intraspinal electrodes generating ankle flexion and extension such that the distance between a sensor on the cat's foot and a free sensor moved back and forth by the investigators was minimized. The foot tracked the displacements of the target sensor through its normal range of motion. Stimulation through electrodes with tips in or near lamina IX elicited movements most suitable for locomotion. In chronically implanted awake cats, stimulation through dorsally located electrodes generated paw shakes and flexion-withdrawals consistent with sensory perception but no weight-bearing extensor movements. These locations would not be suitable for ISMS in incomplete spinal cord injuries. Despite the complexity of the spinal neuronal networks, our results demonstrate that by stimulating through a few intraspinal microwires, near-normal bipedal locomotor-like stepping and feedback-controlled movements could be achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12173741     DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2002.1021588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  39 in total

1.  Initiating extension of the lower limbs in subjects with complete spinal cord injury by epidural lumbar cord stimulation.

Authors:  B Jilge; K Minassian; F Rattay; M M Pinter; F Gerstenbrand; H Binder; M R Dimitrijevic
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Intraspinal microstimulation preferentially recruits fatigue-resistant muscle fibres and generates gradual force in rat.

Authors:  J A Bamford; C T Putman; V K Mushahwar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Modularity of endpoint force patterns evoked using intraspinal microstimulation in treadmill trained and/or neurotrophin-treated chronic spinal cats.

Authors:  Vanessa S Boyce; Michel A Lemay
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Recovery of control of posture and locomotion after a spinal cord injury: solutions staring us in the face.

Authors:  Andy J Fong; Roland R Roy; Ronaldo M Ichiyama; Igor Lavrov; Grégoire Courtine; Yury Gerasimenko; Y C Tai; Joel Burdick; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.453

5.  Hindlimb movement in the cat induced by amplitude-modulated stimulation using extra-spinal electrodes.

Authors:  Changfeng Tai; Jicheng Wang; Bing Shen; Xianchun Wang; James R Roppolo; William C de Groat
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Intraspinal microstimulation for respiratory muscle activation.

Authors:  Michael D Sunshine; Comron N Ganji; Paul J Reier; David D Fuller; Chet T Moritz
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 7.  Neurophysiology and neural engineering: a review.

Authors:  Arthur Prochazka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  In vitro testing of floating light activated micro-electrical stimulators.

Authors:  Ammar Abdo; Vianney Jayasinha; Philipp S Spuhler; M Unlu; Mesut Sahin
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

9.  Therapeutic intraspinal microstimulation improves forelimb function after cervical contusion injury.

Authors:  M R Kasten; M D Sunshine; E S Secrist; P J Horner; C T Moritz
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) as a Micro-Neural Interface Material for Electrostimulation.

Authors:  Seth J Wilks; Sarah M Richardson-Burns; Jeffrey L Hendricks; David C Martin; Kevin J Otto
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2009-06-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.