Literature DB >> 12173719

Unintentional deactivation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in health care settings.

Mary Jane Rasmussen1, Paul A Friedman, Stephen C Hammill, Robert F Rea.   

Abstract

Patients with implanted pacemakers and defibrillators are routinely cautioned regarding exposure to environmental magnetic fields because such exposure may interfere with device function. Previous reports have confirmed interference with bingo wands, stereo speakers, and various workplace sources. In the 4 patients in this report, we document inadvertent alteration of the tachyarrhythmia detection function of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) that occurred in health care settings because of deliberately applied magnetic fields. Three of these patients had pectorally implanted ICDs that may have been confused with pacemakers, and 2 patients had undergone office surgical procedures at which time a magnet had been applied over the device. These events stemmed from (1) potential confusion by health care workers about the nature of the implanted device and (2) unique features in a specific manufacturer's defibrillator. We recommend the following steps to avoid such problems: (1) when device programming hardware and trained personnel are readily available, the patient's device should be interrogated and reprogrammed before and after any procedure involving electrocautery; (2) patients with ICDs should be monitored during device inactivation because they are unprotected from potentially life-threatening arrhythmias during this period; and (3) if the clinical situation does not allow device interrogation and reprogramming, the patient should be monitored electrocardiographically during magnet application and the device interrogated as soon as possible after magnet removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12173719     DOI: 10.4065/77.8.855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  4 in total

Review 1.  Management of cardiac implantable electronic devices during interventional pulmonology procedures.

Authors:  Abhishek Kumar; Samjot Singh Dhillon; Spandan Patel; Matthias Grube; Amit Noheria
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Interference between surgical magnetic drapes and pacemakers: an observational study comparing commercially available devices and a new magnetically isolated drape.

Authors:  Valerie Zaphiratos; Hubert Chiasson; Pierre Drolet; Bruno Benzaquen; Jacques Lapointe; Louis-Philippe Fortier
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.819

3.  Breast tissue expanders and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: An unusual interaction.

Authors:  Malik Muhammad Khurram Sher Khan; Malik Muhammad Humayun Sher Khan; Aaron Tolan; Darryl Elmouchi; Carlos E Tavera
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2015-06-12

Review 4.  Perioperative Management of Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices and Utility of Magnet Application.

Authors:  Tardu Özkartal; Andrea Demarchi; Maria Luce Caputo; Enrico Baldi; Giulio Conte; Angelo Auricchio
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.