Literature DB >> 12172859

Monitoring and healing analysis of 100 tibial shaft fractures.

L Claes1, R Grass, T Schmickal, B Kisse, C Eggers, H Gerngross, W Mutschler, M Arand, T Wintermeyer, A Wentzensen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We assessed the value of measuring biomechanical stiffness by assessing the fixator's external deformation as an objective means for monitoring fracture healing and determining the postoperative treatment regime, as compared to clinical and radiographic means of evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred patients with tibial shaft fractures managed by unilateral external fixation had their fracture stiffness monitored. Stiffness was measured and clinical and radiological examinations were performed every 3-4 weeks.
RESULTS: The time required for healing as indicated by stiffness measurement was an average of 2.5 weeks earlier than by radiological assessment. Eighty-two patients healed within 19 weeks (12.1+/-3.3 weeks) and ten patients in the following 6 weeks (24+/-4.3 weeks). Eight patients did not show an increase in fracture stiffness and received intramedullary nailing at a second operation. The average healing time was 11.3+/-4 weeks for type A, 13.1+/-3.6 weeks for type B fractures, and 15.1+/-5.9 weeks for type C fractures. The healing time for closed fractures was 11.3+/-3.2 weeks and for open fractures 14+/-4.9 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of fracture stiffness allows the detection of patients at risk for nonunions. The healing time increased with increasing fracture gap size and was less in patients with younger age, less complex fractures, and lesser degrees of soft tissue damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12172859     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-002-0306-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  30 in total

Review 1.  [Prevention of infection in the current treatment of open fractures: an evidence-based systematic analysis].

Authors:  S Grote; H Polzer; W C Prall; S Gill; S Shafizadeh; M Banerjee; B Bouillon; H Bäthis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  [Dynamization of fracture fixation : Timing and methods].

Authors:  L Claes
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  A Comparative Evaluation of Fixation Techniques in Anterior Mandibular Fractures Using 2.0 mm Monocortical Titanium Miniplates Versus 2.4 mm Cortical Titanium Lag Screws.

Authors:  Manoj Goyal; Aakarsh Jhamb; Sonia Chawla; Karan Marya; J S Dua; Suman Yadav
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-03-27

4.  Effect of callus development on the deformation of external fixation frames.

Authors:  Franz Burny; Wivine Burny; Monique Donkerwolcke; Markus Behrens
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  [Mechanobiology of fracture healing part 2 : Relevance for internal fixation of fractures].

Authors:  L Claes
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 6.  Diaphyseal long bone nonunions - types, aetiology, economics, and treatment recommendations.

Authors:  Markus Rupp; Christoph Biehl; Matthäus Budak; Ulrich Thormann; Christian Heiss; Volker Alt
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Correlation between RUST assessments of fracture healing to structural and biomechanical properties.

Authors:  Margaret E Cooke; Amira I Hussein; Kyle E Lybrand; Alexander Wulff; Erin Simmons; Jeffrey H Choi; Jody Litrenta; William M Ricci; Jason W Nascone; Robert V O'Toole; Elise F Morgan; Louis C Gerstenfeld; Paul Tornetta
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Utilizing Multiple BioMEMS Sensors to Monitor Orthopaedic Strain and Predict Bone Fracture Healing.

Authors:  Jakob G Wolynski; Conor J Sutherland; Hilmi Volkan Demir; Emre Unal; Akbar Alipour; Christian M Puttlitz; Kirk C McGilvray
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Quantification of fracture healing from radiographs using the maximum callus index.

Authors:  S J Eastaugh-Waring; C C Joslin; J R W Hardy; J L Cunningham
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Osteoblast expression of an engineered Gs-coupled receptor dramatically increases bone mass.

Authors:  Edward C Hsiao; Benjamin M Boudignon; Wei C Chang; Margaret Bencsik; Jeffrey Peng; Trieu D Nguyen; Carlota Manalac; Bernard P Halloran; Bruce R Conklin; Robert A Nissenson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.