BACKGROUND: CAMPATH-1 (CD52)Abs are used in stem-cell transplantation for prevention of GvHD and rejection. The humanized Ab CAMPATH1H has recently replaced the rat Ab CAMPATH-1G. There was a concern whether it might have a longer half-life in vivo and, possibly, cause prolonged immunosuppression post-transplant. METHODS: Serum samples were collected pre- and post-transplant from patients receiving CAMPATH-1H at 10 mg/day according to two protocols: (A) from Day -5 to Day +4 (total dose, 100 mg), (B) from Day -10 to Day -6 (total dose, 50 mg). The Ab concentrations were measured using an immunofluorescence assay. RESULTS: Lymphocytes were substantially depleted by the second day of treatment and were below 0.1 x 10(9)/L by the day of transplant and for at least 1 month post-transplant. By Day 90 there was a greater recovery in Group B, to a median of 0.32 x 10(9)/L compared with 0.25 x 10(9)/L in Group A. By Day 180, both groups had recovered to approx 0.52 x 10(9)/L. Serum concentrations of CAMPATH-1H on the day of transplant were well above the level necessary for opsonization of lymphocytes. The peak Ab concentration was 6.1 micro g/mL in Group A and 2.5 micro g/mL in Group B. CAMPATH-1H could be detected in Group A for 23 days post-transplant, significantly longer than in Group B (11 days). The terminal half-life in the two groups was similar (range 15-21 days) and contrasts with the half-life of < 1 day previously estimated for CAMPATH-1G. There were no cases of graft failure and the incidence of GvHD was similar in the two groups. DISCUSSION: The humanized Ab CAMPATH-1H appears to persist in the circulation for longer than the original rat Ab CAMPATH-1G. This might contribute to delayed lymphocyte recovery and prohibit the use of early donor-lymphocyte infusions. A short course of treatment given early pre-transplant is likely to be preferable to the extended course given both pre- and post-transplant.
BACKGROUND:CAMPATH-1 (CD52)Abs are used in stem-cell transplantation for prevention of GvHD and rejection. The humanized Ab CAMPATH1H has recently replaced the rat Ab CAMPATH-1G. There was a concern whether it might have a longer half-life in vivo and, possibly, cause prolonged immunosuppression post-transplant. METHODS: Serum samples were collected pre- and post-transplant from patients receiving CAMPATH-1H at 10 mg/day according to two protocols: (A) from Day -5 to Day +4 (total dose, 100 mg), (B) from Day -10 to Day -6 (total dose, 50 mg). The Ab concentrations were measured using an immunofluorescence assay. RESULTS: Lymphocytes were substantially depleted by the second day of treatment and were below 0.1 x 10(9)/L by the day of transplant and for at least 1 month post-transplant. By Day 90 there was a greater recovery in Group B, to a median of 0.32 x 10(9)/L compared with 0.25 x 10(9)/L in Group A. By Day 180, both groups had recovered to approx 0.52 x 10(9)/L. Serum concentrations of CAMPATH-1H on the day of transplant were well above the level necessary for opsonization of lymphocytes. The peak Ab concentration was 6.1 micro g/mL in Group A and 2.5 micro g/mL in Group B. CAMPATH-1H could be detected in Group A for 23 days post-transplant, significantly longer than in Group B (11 days). The terminal half-life in the two groups was similar (range 15-21 days) and contrasts with the half-life of < 1 day previously estimated for CAMPATH-1G. There were no cases of graft failure and the incidence of GvHD was similar in the two groups. DISCUSSION: The humanized Ab CAMPATH-1H appears to persist in the circulation for longer than the original rat Ab CAMPATH-1G. This might contribute to delayed lymphocyte recovery and prohibit the use of early donor-lymphocyte infusions. A short course of treatment given early pre-transplant is likely to be preferable to the extended course given both pre- and post-transplant.
Authors: Sacha A De Serres; Bechara G Mfarrej; Ciara N Magee; Fanny Benitez; Isa Ashoor; Mohamed H Sayegh; William E Harmon; Nader Najafian Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-11-03 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Rebecca A Marsh; Marepalli B Rao; Aharon Gefen; Denise Bellman; Parinda A Mehta; Pooja Khandelwal; Sharat Chandra; Sonata Jodele; Kasiani C Myers; Michael Grimley; Christopher Dandoy; Javier El-Bietar; Ashish R Kumar; Tom Leemhuis; Kejian Zhang; Jack J Bleesing; Michael B Jordan; Alexandra H Filipovich; Stella M Davies Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2015-04-10 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: C P Fox; D Burns; A N Parker; K S Peggs; C M Harvey; S Natarajan; D I Marks; B Jackson; G Chakupurakal; M Dennis; Z Lim; G Cook; B Carpenter; A R Pettitt; S Mathew; L Connelly-Smith; J A L Yin; M Viskaduraki; R Chakraverty; K Orchard; B E Shaw; J L Byrne; C Brookes; C F Craddock; S Chaganti Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2013-11-11 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Matthew M Hsieh; Elizabeth M Kang; Courtney D Fitzhugh; M Beth Link; Charles D Bolan; Roger Kurlander; Richard W Childs; Griffin P Rodgers; Jonathan D Powell; John F Tisdale Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-12-10 Impact factor: 91.245