| Literature DB >> 24212561 |
C P Fox1, D Burns2, A N Parker3, K S Peggs4, C M Harvey5, S Natarajan6, D I Marks7, B Jackson8, G Chakupurakal9, M Dennis10, Z Lim11, G Cook12, B Carpenter13, A R Pettitt14, S Mathew15, L Connelly-Smith16, J A L Yin4, M Viskaduraki17, R Chakraverty13, K Orchard18, B E Shaw8, J L Byrne5, C Brookes17, C F Craddock2, S Chaganti2.
Abstract
EBV-associated post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) following Alemtuzumab-based allo-SCT is a relatively uncommon and challenging clinical problem but has not received detailed study in a large cohort. Quantitative-PCR (qPCR) monitoring for EBV reactivation post allo-SCT is now commonplace but its diagnostic and predictive value remains unclear. Sixty-nine patients with PTLD following Alemtuzumab-based allo-SCT were studied. Marked clinicopathological heterogeneity was evident; lymphadenopathy was frequently absent, whereas advanced extranodal disease was common. The median viral load at clinical presentation was 49 300 copies/mL (50-65 200 000 copies/mL) and, notably, 23% and 45% of cases, respectively, had 10 000 and 40 000 copies/mL. The overall response rate to rituximab as first-line therapy was 70%. For rituximab failures, chemotherapy was ineffectual but DLIs were successful. A four-parameter prognostic index predicted response to therapy (OR 0.30 (0.12-0.74); P=0.009] and PTLD mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 1.81 (1.12-2.93) P=0.02) on multivariate analysis. This is the largest detailed series of EBV-associated PTLD after allo-SCT. At clinical presentation, EBV-qPCR values are frequently below customary thresholds for pre-emptive therapy, challenging current paradigms for monitoring and intervention. A four-point score identifies a proportion of patients at risk of rituximab-refractory disease for whom alternative therapy is needed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24212561 DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2013.170
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant ISSN: 0268-3369 Impact factor: 5.483