Literature DB >> 12169906

Evaluation of endotracheal tube safety for CO2 laser resurfacing.

John C Ferguson1, Rebecca T Carr, Edward W Chang, Edward H Farrior.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The new generation carbon dioxide lasers have become popular as a result of their ease of use and consistent results. Their use is becoming widespread with both the experienced laser surgery clinician and those just venturing into the realm of laser resurfacing. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of the common PVC endotracheal and one designed for laser procedures if contacted by the CO2 laser during resurfacing. In addition, the cost and efficacy of a simple covering to the PVC tube was assessed. STUDY
DESIGN: Endotracheal tubes were subjected to multiple passes of the Coherent Ultrapulse laser system while recording tube effect and intraluminal temperature.
METHOD: With the highest energy densities used in our practice, multiple passes were made over both PVC and Xomed Laser-Shield II endotracheal tubes with 100% intraluminal oxygen. Thermocouplers recorded both inflow and outflow temperatures. The procedure was repeated with PVC endotracheal tubes covered with saline-soaked sponges held in place with netting.
RESULTS: Charring of the PVC tube occurred after 1 pass, and intraluminal smoke was present after 21.6 passes. The Laser-Shield II and the wrapped PVC tube did not show significant charring or tube lumen breach after up to 200 passes. The prepared PVC tube was $105.14 less than the commercial tube.
CONCLUSIONS: Our method of PVC endotracheal tube preparation provides a safe, inexpensive, reliable airway during CO2 laser resurfacing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12169906     DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200207000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  4 in total

1.  Laser safety in head and neck cancer surgery.

Authors:  Ferhan Ahmed; Andrew J Kinshuck; Michael Harrison; Dan O'Brien; Jeffrey Lancaster; Nicholas J Roland; Shaun R Jackson; Terrence M Jones
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Patient safety in otolaryngology: a descriptive review.

Authors:  Julian Danino; Jameel Muzaffar; Chris Metcalfe; Chris Coulson
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Treatment of Advanced Carcinoma of the Larynx and Hypopharynx with Laser Followed by External Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Lalee Varghese; John Mathew; Subhashini John; Anand Job
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-09

Review 4.  Allopurinol hypersensitivity: a systematic review of all published cases, 1950-2012.

Authors:  Sheena N Ramasamy; Cameron S Korb-Wells; Diluk R W Kannangara; Myles W H Smith; Nan Wang; Darren M Roberts; Garry G Graham; Kenneth M Williams; Richard O Day
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.228

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.