Literature DB >> 20652294

Laser safety in head and neck cancer surgery.

Ferhan Ahmed1, Andrew J Kinshuck, Michael Harrison, Dan O'Brien, Jeffrey Lancaster, Nicholas J Roland, Shaun R Jackson, Terrence M Jones.   

Abstract

The use of trans-oral laser techniques for the resection of head and neck carcinomas has increased exponentially over the last four decades. Inadvertent laser damage to the patient or operating theatre staff is an acknowledged risk. However, no data exist to verify the safety margin of commonly employed precautions. The aims of this study was to assess the safety margins of protective strategies commonly adopted when using CO(2) lasers to resect tumours of the head and neck. A Sigmacon Acupulse Lumenis CO(2) laser was evaluated. The beam was focused to 2 mm diameter at 402 mm focal length. Gauze swabs, neurosurgical patties, surgical gloves, paper drapes and conventional endotracheal (ET) tubes were tested against the following laser variables: power, beam characteristics and angle of beam incidence (90 & 45°). Laser penetration time through the material under test was recorded in seconds (s). All the materials where tested dry and some, when appropriate, were tested wet. The mean of three recordings was calculated. The results demonstrated dry gauze swabs, neurosurgical patties and paper drapes provided 0 s protection at 2 W (lowest power). However, when wet, the laser failed to penetrate the swabs and neurosurgical patties, even after 180 s of continuous application. Gloves (single or double layer), and ET cuffs were penetrated in less than 1 s at 2 W. Time to penetrate a size 6.0 ET tube at 2 W continuous setting increased from <1 s at 90° to 42 s at 45°. These data are essential for anyone using CO(2) lasers for the resection of head and neck tumours. The importance of keeping laser consumables wet throughout the procedure is highlighted. The angle at which the laser hits the ET tube may impart some protection against airway fire but the data support the need to cover the ET tube with damp swabs or neuropatties when possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20652294     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-010-1312-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  29 in total

Review 1.  Principles of CO2/erbium laser safety.

Authors:  D J Fader; D Ratner
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.398

2.  Fire hazard during CO2 laser microsurgery on the larynx and trachea.

Authors:  J C Snow; M L Norton; T S Saluja; A F Estanislao
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1976 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Advantage of rubber over plastic endotracheal tubes for rapid extubation in a laser fire.

Authors:  M B Sosis; B Braverman
Journal:  J Clin Laser Med Surg       Date:  1996-04

4.  Laser surgery in the aerodigestive tract.

Authors:  M S Strong; G J Jako; T Polanyi; R A Wallace
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Precautions in use of a new endotracheal tube for laser surgery.

Authors:  R Rubiano; J L Chang; C E Larson; R A Lawler; P Rehkopf
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Acute management of laser-ignited intratracheal explosion.

Authors:  V L Schramm; D E Mattox; S E Stool
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Incendiary characteristics of endotracheal tubes with the carbon dioxide laser. Supplemental report.

Authors:  C T Yarington; G E Thompson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1982 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.547

8.  The CO2 laser in the laryngeal microsurgery.

Authors:  G Motta; G Villari; G Motta; G Ripa; G Salerno
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1986

9.  Microlaryngoscopic surgery for T1 glottic lesions: a cost-effective option.

Authors:  E N Myers; R L Wagner; J T Johnson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  [Endolaryngeal laser surgery in the treatment of laryngeal cancers. The current Cologne concept].

Authors:  W F Thumfart; H E Eckel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 1.284

View more
  4 in total

1.  Airway management and endoscopic treatment of subglottic and tracheal stenosis: the laryngeal mask airway technique.

Authors:  Nopawan Vorasubin; Darshni Vira; Nausheen Jamal; Dinesh K Chhetri
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 2.  Patient safety in otolaryngology: a descriptive review.

Authors:  Julian Danino; Jameel Muzaffar; Chris Metcalfe; Chris Coulson
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  CO2 lasers in the management of potentially malignant and malignant oral disorders.

Authors:  Waseem Jerjes; Zaid Hamdoon; Colin Hopper
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2012-04-30

Review 4.  Surgical errors and risks - the head and neck cancer patient.

Authors:  Ulrich Harréus
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.