Literature DB >> 12169415

The P600 as an indicator of syntactic ambiguity.

Stefan Frisch1, Matthias Schlesewsky, Douglas Saddy, Annegret Alpermann.   

Abstract

In a study using event-related brain potentials, we show that the current characterization of the P600 component as an indicator of revision processes (reanalysis and repair) in sentence comprehension must be extended to include the recognition of syntactic ambiguity. By comparing the processing of ambiguous and unambiguous sentence constituents in German, we show that the P600 is elicited when our language processing system has syntactic alternatives at a certain item given in the input string. That the P600 is sensitive to syntactic ambiguity adds crucial evidence to current debates in psycholinguistic modelling, as the results clearly favour parallel models of syntactic processing which assume that ambiguity is recognized and costly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12169415     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00126-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  27 in total

1.  ERPs reveal comparable syntactic sentence processing in native and non-native readers of English.

Authors:  Sonja A Kotz; Phillip J Holcomb; Lee Osterhout
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2007-12-03

2.  Towards dynamical system models of language-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Peter Beim Graben; Sabrina Gerth; Shravan Vasishth
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  Unifying syntactic theory and sentence processing difficulty through a connectionist minimalist parser.

Authors:  Sabrina Gerth; Peter Beim Graben
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  The processing difference between person names and common nouns in sentence contexts: an ERP study.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Rinus G Verdonschot; Yufang Yang
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-01-10

5.  How is sentence processing affected by external semantic and syntactic information? Evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Annekathrin Schacht; Manuel Martín-Loeches; Pilar Casado; Rasha Abdel Rahman; Alejandra Sel; Werner Sommer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Word order processing in a second language: from VO to OV.

Authors:  Kepa Erdocia; Adam Zawiszewski; Itziar Laka
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2014-12

7.  ERP evidence for telicity effects on syntactic processing in garden-path sentences.

Authors:  Evguenia Malaia; Ronnie B Wilbur; Christine Weber-Fox
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  P600-like positivity and Left Anterior Negativity responses are elicited by semantic reversibility in nonanomalous sentences.

Authors:  Jed A Meltzer; Allen R Braun
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.710

9.  The use of acoustic information in lexical ambiguity resolution: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Stephanie C Leach; Erin Conwell
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  Information structure influences depth of syntactic processing: event-related potential evidence for the Chomsky illusion.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Marcel Bastiaansen; Yufang Yang; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.