Literature DB >> 12169349

The pancake phenomenon contributes to the inaccuracy of margin assessment in patients with breast cancer.

Roger A Graham1, Marc J Homer, Judith Katz, Janice Rothschild, Homa Safaii, Stacey Supran.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To determine the effect on margin evaluation for patients with breast cancer, we prospectively quantified the "flattening" of the breast specimen after surgical removal.
METHODS: The volume and height of 100 consecutive breast biopsy specimens were recorded independently by the operating surgeon and the pathologist. Five factors were analyzed that were thought to contribute to changes in specimen dimensions: patient age, breast tissue density, mammographic lesion type, specimen size, and the use of compression during specimen radiography.
RESULTS: After surgical removal, mean volume and height of the breast specimens decreased from 46 cm(3) to 29 cm(3) (30%) and from 2.6 cm to 1.4 cm (46%), respectively. Flattening of the breast specimens occurred in all subgroups studied.
CONCLUSIONS: Breast specimens are flattened after surgical removal, losing almost 50% of their original height. This "pancake" phenomenon has important implications for the accuracy of margin analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12169349     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00902-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  24 in total

1.  Preclinical evaluation of nuclear morphometry and tissue topology for breast carcinoma detection and margin assessment.

Authors:  Ndeke Nyirenda; Daniel L Farkas; V Krishnan Ramanujan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Does Age Matter? Estimating Risks of Locoregional Recurrence After Breast-conservative Surgery.

Authors:  Gianluca Vanni; Marco Materazzo; Marco Pellicciaro; Ljuba Morando; Ilaria Portarena; Lucia Anemona; Maria Rolando D'Angelillo; Rosaria Barbarino; Agostino Chiaravalloti; Rosaria Meucci; Tommaso Perretta; Camilla Deiana; Paolo Orsaria; Jonathan Caspi; Chiara Adriana Pistolese; Oreste Claudio Buonomo
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 3.  Appropriate margin for lumpectomy excision of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Andrea V Barrio; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-07

4.  Flexible silicon sensors for diffuse reflectance spectroscopy of tissue.

Authors:  David M Miller; Nan M Jokerst
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of whole-mount pathology processing for patients with early breast cancer undergoing breast conservation.

Authors:  N J Look Hong; G M Clarke; M J Yaffe; C M B Holloway
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  The effect of simultaneous peripheral excision in breast conservation upon margin status.

Authors:  Roshani R Patel; Tianyu Li; Eric A Ross; Linda Sesa; Elin R Sigurdson; Richard J Bleicher
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Role of specimen US for predicting resection margin status in breast conserving therapy.

Authors:  M Moschetta; M Telegrafo; T Introna; L Coi; L Rella; V Ranieri; A Cirili; A A Stabile Ianora; G Angelelli
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct

8.  Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Meena S Moran; Stuart J Schnitt; Armando E Giuliano; Jay R Harris; Seema A Khan; Janet Horton; Suzanne Klimberg; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Gary Freedman; Nehmat Houssami; Peggy L Johnson; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  What is an adequate margin for breast-conserving surgery? Surgeon attitudes and correlates.

Authors:  Michelle Azu; Paul Abrahamse; Steven J Katz; Reshma Jagsi; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 10.  Margins in breast cancer: How much is enough?

Authors:  Melissa Pilewskie; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.