Literature DB >> 12166562

MRI of the pharynx and treatment efficacy of a mandibular advancement device in obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome.

B M Sanner1, M Heise, B Knoben, M Machnick, U Laufer, R Kikuth, W Zidek, B Hellmich.   

Abstract

In obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS), prosthetic mandibular advancement devices (MAD) seem to be a promising treatment alternative to conventional continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Unfortunately, while they are effective in some patients, they are ineffective in others or may even worsen OSAS. At present, it is not known whether predictors can be defined which allow for estimation of the potential effect of oral appliances on the severity of OSAS. Clinical and polysomnographical efficacy of a MAD was evaluated in 15 patients with OSAS. In addition, ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pharynx was performed in 13 of these patients at rest during transnasal shallow respiration and during performance of the Muller manoeuvre, both with and without the MAD, and the site of closure was determined. The MAD reduced the mean apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI) from 19.8+/-14.5 to 7.2+/-7.4 x h(-1). Seven subjects (53.8%) had at least a 50% reduction in AHI to a value <10 x h(-1) with the MAD, whereas the MAD was ineffective in six patients. Five of the seven treatment responders had no significant pharyngeal obstruction during the manoeuvre with the device, while all of them had pharyngeal obstruction when not equipped with the device. Four of the six patients with treatment failure had a single velopharyngeal obstruction and two a combined obstruction of the velo- and glossopharynx during the Muller manoeuvre while wearing the device. The results of this study suggest that airway patency during the Muller manoeuvre while wearing a mandibular advancement device may be predictive of the success of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome treatment with a mandibular advancement device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12166562     DOI: 10.1183/09031936.02.00268902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Update on upper airway evaluation in obstructive sleep apnea].

Authors:  J T Maurer; B A Stuck
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Effects of varying mandibular protrusion and degrees of vertical opening on upper airway dimensions in apneic dentate subjects.

Authors:  B Piskin; O Karakoc; H Genc; S Akay; C Sipahi; M Erdem; B Karaman; S Gorgulu; S Yetkin; S Ayyildiz
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Comparative effects of two oral appliances on upper airway structure in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Kate Sutherland; Sheryn A Deane; Andrew S L Chan; Richard J Schwab; Andrew T Ng; M Ali Darendeliler; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 5.849

4.  The relationship between specific nasopharyngoscopic features and treatment deterioration with mandibular advancement devices: a prospective study.

Authors:  Eli Van de Perck; Sara Op de Beeck; Marijke Dieltjens; Anneclaire V Vroegop; Annelies E Verbruggen; Marc Willemen; Johan Verbraecken; Paul H Van de Heyning; Marc J Braem; Olivier M Vanderveken
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.062

5.  Oral appliance effectively reverses Muller's maneuver-induced upper airway collapsibility in obstructive sleep apnea and hypopnea syndrome.

Authors:  Yanhui Zhao; Huimin Shi; Xiaofeng Lu; Jindong Chen; Ping Nie; Yanmei Tang; Li Tao; Min Zhu
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 2.816

6.  Videoendoscopic diagnosis for predicting the response to oral appliance therapy in severe obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Sasao; Kanji Nohara; Kentaro Okuno; Yuki Nakamura; Takayoshi Sakai
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.816

7.  Quantitative Morphometric Measurements of the Oropharynx in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Using a Laser Depth Measurement Module.

Authors:  Chung-Feng Jeffrey Kuo; Chun-Shu Lin; Cheng-Hsien Chuang; Chung-Shen Lin; Feng-Shiang Chiu; Shao-Cheng Liu
Journal:  Nat Sci Sleep       Date:  2020-12-14

8.  Interaction between otorhinolaryngology and orthodontics: correlation between the nasopharyngeal airway and the craniofacial complex.

Authors:  Angelika Stellzig-Eisenhauer; Philipp Meyer-Marcotty
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-04-27

Review 9.  Cephalometric predictors of treatment outcome with mandibular advancement devices in adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review.

Authors:  Giulio Alessandri-Bonetti; Daniela Rita Ippolito; Maria Lavinia Bartolucci; Vincenzo D'Antò; Serena Incerti-Parenti
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Tongue Pressure Sensing Array Integrated with a System-on-Chip Embedded in a Mandibular Advancement Splint.

Authors:  Yun-Ting Chen; Kun-Ying Yeh; Szu-Han Chen; Chuang-Yin Wang; Chao-Chi Yeh; Ming-Xin Xu; Shey-Shi Lu; Yunn-Jy Chen; Yao-Joe Yang
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-14       Impact factor: 2.891

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.