Ashima K Kant1. 1. Department of Family, Nutrition, and Exercise Sciences, Queens College of the City University of New York, Flushing 11367, USA. ashima_kant@qc1.qc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Low reporting of food intake is an acknowledged problem in dietary assessments; however, differences in food intake relative to reporting status are poorly understood. This study examined the relation of a measure of dietary reporting status with the nature of food intake reported by adults in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. METHODS: Subjects were 6948 women and 6452 men, 20 years of age or older, with a complete and reliable 24-hour dietary recall. The ratio of reported energy intake to estimated basal energy expenditure (EI/BEE) was computed as a measure of dietary reporting status. The independent relation of EI/BEE ratio with 1) the amount, number, and energy density of nutrient-dense and low-nutrient-dense foods, 2) the number of reported eating occasions, 3) macro- and micronutrient intake and 4) serum concentrations of folate, ascorbate and carotenoids were examined using gender-specific multiple regression models. RESULTS: The EI/BEE ratio related positively with the amount, number and energy density of both nutrient-dense and low-nutrient-dense foods, and grams of alcoholic beverages. The EI/BEE ratio was an independent negative predictor of serum folate, ascorbate and alpha-carotene concentrations confirming the underreporting of food sources of these nutrients. The relative odds of reporting < or = 30% of energy as fat or < 10% of energy as saturated fat decreased with ratio of EI/BEE; however, the odds of reporting all five food groups or meeting the recommended intake of selected micronutrients increased with EI/BEE. CONCLUSIONS: The quantity and the quality of food intake reported in the 24-hour recall in NHANES III differed in relation to the ratio of EI/BEE.
OBJECTIVE: Low reporting of food intake is an acknowledged problem in dietary assessments; however, differences in food intake relative to reporting status are poorly understood. This study examined the relation of a measure of dietary reporting status with the nature of food intake reported by adults in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. METHODS: Subjects were 6948 women and 6452 men, 20 years of age or older, with a complete and reliable 24-hour dietary recall. The ratio of reported energy intake to estimated basal energy expenditure (EI/BEE) was computed as a measure of dietary reporting status. The independent relation of EI/BEE ratio with 1) the amount, number, and energy density of nutrient-dense and low-nutrient-dense foods, 2) the number of reported eating occasions, 3) macro- and micronutrient intake and 4) serum concentrations of folate, ascorbate and carotenoids were examined using gender-specific multiple regression models. RESULTS: The EI/BEE ratio related positively with the amount, number and energy density of both nutrient-dense and low-nutrient-dense foods, and grams of alcoholic beverages. The EI/BEE ratio was an independent negative predictor of serum folate, ascorbate and alpha-carotene concentrations confirming the underreporting of food sources of these nutrients. The relative odds of reporting < or = 30% of energy as fat or < 10% of energy as saturated fat decreased with ratio of EI/BEE; however, the odds of reporting all five food groups or meeting the recommended intake of selected micronutrients increased with EI/BEE. CONCLUSIONS: The quantity and the quality of food intake reported in the 24-hour recall in NHANES III differed in relation to the ratio of EI/BEE.
Authors: Gregory J Tranah; Todd M Manini; Kurt K Lohman; Michael A Nalls; Stephen Kritchevsky; Anne B Newman; Tamara B Harris; Iva Miljkovic; Alessandro Biffi; Steven R Cummings; Yongmei Liu Journal: Mitochondrion Date: 2011-05-09 Impact factor: 4.160
Authors: Todd M Manini; James E Everhart; Stephen D Anton; Dale A Schoeller; Steve R Cummings; Dawn C Mackey; Matthew J Delmonico; Douglas C Bauer; Eleanor M Simonsick; Lisa H Colbert; Marjolein Visser; Frances Tylavsky; Anne B Newman; Tamara B Harris Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2009-09-09 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Nisha A Mohindra; Theresa A Nicklas; Carol E O'neil; Su-Jau T Yang; Gerald S Berenson Journal: Int J Food Sci Nutr Date: 2009-05-21 Impact factor: 3.833
Authors: Carlos A Reyes-Ortiz; Hyunsu Ju; Karl Eschbach; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2009-03-02 Impact factor: 4.022