Literature DB >> 12163725

An ex vivo evaluation of an inflatable bone tamp used to reduce fractures within vertebral bodies under load.

Stephen M Belkoff1, Louis E Jasper, Sheila S Stevens.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Ex vivo biomechanical study using osteoporotic cadaveric vertebral bodies.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if fracture reduction could be achieved by the inflatable bone tamp (tamp) in vertebral bodies under simulated physiologic loads. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous ex vivo biomechanical studies showed that kyphoplasty restored vertebral body height with vertebral body endplates under stress-free conditions.
METHODS: Simulated compression fractures were experimentally created in 18 osteoporotic vertebral bodies alternatingly assigned to one of two treatment (tamp inflation) groups: low axial load (111 N) or high axial load (222 N). Each vertebral body was then placed between two platens in a special radiolucent loading fixture and subjected to the preassigned load to simulate in vivo physiologic loading. The tamps were inflated and postreduction heights were measured fluoroscopically. The effect of applied load and condition on vertebral body height was checked for significance (P < 0.05).
RESULTS: Comparing the experimental conditions (initial, postcompression, postinflation), there were no significant vertebral body height differences between the load groups (low load vs. high load). However, vertebral body height differences between conditions within each load group were all significant. For the low-load and high-load groups, mean postinflation heights (24.4 and 24.4 mm) were significantly greater than mean postcompression heights (21.6 and 22.5 mm) but significantly less than initial vertebral body heights (26.6 and 26.3 mm), respectively. Initial heights were fully restored in 22% (two of nine) of vertebral bodies in both groups.
CONCLUSION: The inflatable bone tamp restored some of the height lost to compression fractures in vertebral bodies under simulated physiologic loads.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12163725     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200208010-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

1.  Analysis of anatomic morphometry of the pedicles and the safe zone for through-pedicle procedures in the thoracic and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Shiu-Bii Lien; Nien-Hsien Liou; Shing-Sheng Wu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Maurits H J Voormolen
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Osteoporotic vertebral fractures without compression: key factors of diagnosis and initial outcome of treatment with cement augmentation.

Authors:  Haiqing Mao; Jun Zou; Dechun Geng; Xuesong Zhu; Mo Zhu; Weimin Jiang; Huilin Yang
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Biomechanical in vitro comparison of radiofrequency kyphoplasty and balloon kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Gerhard Achatz; Hans-Joachim Riesner; Benedikt Friemert; Raimund Lechner; Nicolas Graf; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  [Osteoporotic vertebral fractures-From diagnosis to treatment].

Authors:  Achim Benditz; Jörg Jerosch
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 1.530

Review 6.  Vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spine fracture: prevention and treatment.

Authors:  A Mehbod; S Aunoble; J C Le Huec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Kyphoplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Paul F Heini; Rene Orler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-02-25       Impact factor: 3.134

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.