Literature DB >> 12163553

Interhemispheric transmission of visuomotor information in humans: fMRI evidence.

M Tettamanti1, E Paulesu, P Scifo, A Maravita, F Fazio, D Perani, C A Marzi.   

Abstract

Normal human subjects underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while performing a simple visual manual reaction-time (RT) task with lateralized brief stimuli, the so-called Poffenberger's paradigm. This paradigm was employed to measure interhemispheric transmission (IT) time by subtracting mean RT for the uncrossed hemifield-hand conditions, that is, those conditions not requiring an IT, from the crossed hemifield-hand conditions, that is, those conditions requiring an IT to relay visual information from the hemisphere of entry to the hemisphere subserving the response. The obtained difference is widely believed to reflect callosal conduction time, but so far there is no direct physiological evidence in humans. The aim of our experiment was twofold: first, to test the hypothesis that IT of visuomotor information requires the corpus callosum and to identify the cortical areas specifically activated during IT. Second, we sought to discover whether IT occurs mainly at premotor or perceptual stages of information processing. We found significant activations in a number of frontal, parietal, and temporal cortical areas and in the genu of the corpus callosum. These activations were present only in the crossed conditions and therefore were specifically related to IT. No selective activation was present in the uncrossed conditions. The location of the activated callosal and cortical areas suggests that IT occurs mainly, but not exclusively, at premotor level. These results provide clear cut evidence in favor of the hypothesis that the crossed-uncrossed difference in the Poffenberger paradigm depends on IT rather than on a differential hemispheric activation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12163553     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2002.88.2.1051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  60 in total

1.  Effects of trifluoromethylphenylpiperazine (TFMPP) on interhemispheric communication.

Authors:  HeeSeung Lee; Rob R Kydd; Vanessa K Lim; Ian J Kirk; Bruce R Russell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  At what stage of manual visual reaction time does interhemispheric transmission occur: controlled or ballistic?

Authors:  C Cavina-Pratesi; E Bricolo; B Pellegrini; C A Marzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visuo-motor pathways in humans revealed by event-related fMRI.

Authors:  Roberto Martuzzi; Micah M Murray; Philippe P Maeder; Eleonora Fornari; Jean- Philippe Thiran; Stephanie Clarke; Christoph M Michel; Reto A Meuli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Magnetic stimulation and the crossed-uncrossed difference (CUD) paradigm: selective effects in the ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres.

Authors:  Tzu-Ching Chiang; Michal Lavidor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Interhemispheric transfer of phosphenes generated by occipital versus parietal transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Carlo A Marzi; Francesca Mancini; Silvia Savazzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Differential impairment of interhemispheric transmission in bipolar disease.

Authors:  Vincenzo Florio; Silvia Savazzi; Andreas Conca; Carlo A Marzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Task Dependence, Tissue Specificity, and Spatial Distribution of Widespread Activations in Large Single-Subject Functional MRI Datasets at 7T.

Authors:  Javier Gonzalez-Castillo; Colin W Hoy; Daniel A Handwerker; Vinai Roopchansingh; Souheil J Inati; Ziad S Saad; Robert W Cox; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Learning-based structurally-guided construction of resting-state functional correlation tensors.

Authors:  Lichi Zhang; Han Zhang; Xiaobo Chen; Qian Wang; Pew-Thian Yap; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  Does experience in talking facilitate speech repetition?

Authors:  Linda I Shuster; Donna R Moore; Gang Chen; Dennis M Ruscello; William F Wonderlin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  BOLD correlates of trial-by-trial reaction time variability in gray and white matter: a multi-study fMRI analysis.

Authors:  Tal Yarkoni; Deanna M Barch; Jeremy R Gray; Thomas E Conturo; Todd S Braver
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.