Literature DB >> 12161582

Death with dignity.

Peter Allmark1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to develop a conception of death with dignity and to examine whether it is vulnerable to the sort of criticisms that have been made of other conceptions. In this conception "death" is taken to apply to the process of dying; "dignity" is taken to be something that attaches to people because of their personal qualities. In particular, someone lives with dignity if they live well (in accordance with reason, as Aristotle would see it). It follows that health care professionals cannot confer on patients either dignity or death with dignity. They can, however, attempt to ensure that the patient dies without indignity. Indignities are affronts to human dignity, and include such things as serious pain and the exclusion of patients from involvement in decisions about their lives and deaths. This fairly modest conception of death with dignity avoids the traps of being overly subjective or of viewing the sick and helpless as "undignified".

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Death and Euthanasia

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12161582      PMCID: PMC1733631          DOI: 10.1136/jme.28.4.255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  4 in total

1.  The indignity of 'death with dignity'

Authors:  Paul Ramsey
Journal:  Stud Hastings Cent       Date:  1974-05

2.  Averting one's eyes, or facing the music?--on dignity in death.

Authors:  Leon R Kass
Journal:  Stud Hastings Cent       Date:  1974-05

3.  "Death with dignity".

Authors:  C M Coope
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.683

4.  Constructions of dignity in end-of-life care.

Authors:  A F Street; D W Kissane
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.250

  4 in total
  9 in total

1.  Should children's autonomy be respected by telling them of their imminent death?

Authors:  T Vince; A Petros
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Ageing prisoners' views on death and dying: contemplating end-of-life in prison.

Authors:  Violet Handtke; Tenzin Wangmo
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Assessment of factors influencing preservation of dignity at life's end: creation and the cross-cultural validation of the preservation of dignity card-sort tool.

Authors:  Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil; Arthur M Noda; Helena Chmura Kraemer
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 4.  [Limits of pain treatment: medical and judicial aspects].

Authors:  M Zenz; R Rissing-van Saan
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  Creation and the empirical validation of the dignity card-sort tool to assess factors influencing erosion of dignity at life's end.

Authors:  Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil; Helena Chmura Kraemer; Arthur Noda
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  The particularity of dignity: relational engagement in care at the end of life.

Authors:  Jeannette Pols; Bernike Pasveer; Dick Willems
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2018-03

7.  Factors affecting quality of end-of-life hospital care - a qualitative analysis of free text comments from the i-CODE survey in Norway.

Authors:  Marit Irene Tuen Hansen; Dagny Faksvåg Haugen; Katrin Ruth Sigurdardottir; Anne Kvikstad; Catriona R Mayland; Margrethe Aase Schaufel
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 3.234

8.  Current controversies and irresolvable disagreement: the case of Vincent Lambert and the role of 'dissensus'.

Authors:  Dominic Wilkinson; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Attitudes towards assisted suicide and euthanasia among care-dependent older adults (50+) in Austria: the role of socio-demographics, religiosity, physical illness, psychological distress, and social isolation.

Authors:  Erwin Stolz; Hannes Mayerl; Peter Gasser-Steiner; Wolfgang Freidl
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 2.652

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.