BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Carotid endarterectomy has been shown to be beneficial in symptomatic patients with a severe stenosis (70% to 99%) of the internal carotid artery (ICA). Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the standard of reference in the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis but has a relatively high complication rate. In a diagnostic study we investigated the accuracy of noninvasive testing compared with DSA. METHODS: In a prospective diagnostic study we performed duplex ultrasound (DUS), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and DSA on 350 consecutive symptomatic patients. Stenoses were measured with the observers blinded for clinical information and other test results. Separate and combined test results of DUS and MRA were compared with the reference standard DSA. Only the stenosis measurements of the arteries on the symptomatic side were included in the analyses. RESULTS: DUS analyzed with previously defined criteria resulted in a sensitivity of 87.5% (95% CI, 82.1% to 92.9%) and a specificity of 75.7% (95% CI, 69.3% to 82.2%) in identifying severe ICA stenosis (70% to 99%). Stenosis measurements on MRA yielded a sensitivity of 92.2% (95% CI, 86.2% to 96.2%) and a specificity of 75.7% (95% CI, 68.6% to 82.5%). When we combined MRA and DUS results, agreement between these 2 modalities (84% of patients) gave a sensitivity of 96.3% (95% CI, 90.8% to 99.0%) and a specificity of 80.2% (95% CI, 73.1% to 87.3%) for identifying severe stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: MRA showed a slightly better accuracy than DUS in the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis. To achieve the best accuracy, however, both tests should be performed subsequently.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Carotid endarterectomy has been shown to be beneficial in symptomatic patients with a severe stenosis (70% to 99%) of the internal carotid artery (ICA). Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the standard of reference in the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis but has a relatively high complication rate. In a diagnostic study we investigated the accuracy of noninvasive testing compared with DSA. METHODS: In a prospective diagnostic study we performed duplex ultrasound (DUS), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and DSA on 350 consecutive symptomatic patients. Stenoses were measured with the observers blinded for clinical information and other test results. Separate and combined test results of DUS and MRA were compared with the reference standard DSA. Only the stenosis measurements of the arteries on the symptomatic side were included in the analyses. RESULTS: DUS analyzed with previously defined criteria resulted in a sensitivity of 87.5% (95% CI, 82.1% to 92.9%) and a specificity of 75.7% (95% CI, 69.3% to 82.2%) in identifying severe ICA stenosis (70% to 99%). Stenosis measurements on MRA yielded a sensitivity of 92.2% (95% CI, 86.2% to 96.2%) and a specificity of 75.7% (95% CI, 68.6% to 82.5%). When we combined MRA and DUS results, agreement between these 2 modalities (84% of patients) gave a sensitivity of 96.3% (95% CI, 90.8% to 99.0%) and a specificity of 80.2% (95% CI, 73.1% to 87.3%) for identifying severe stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: MRA showed a slightly better accuracy than DUS in the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis. To achieve the best accuracy, however, both tests should be performed subsequently.
Authors: Hugo A F Gratama van Andel; Erik Meijering; Aad van der Lugt; Henri A Vrooman; Cecile de Monyé; Rik Stokking Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-09-17 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Evert F S van Velsen; Wiro J Niessen; Thomas T de Weert; Cécile de Monyé; Aad van der Lugt; Erik Meijering; Rik Stokking Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-11-01 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Cécile de Monyé; Diederik W J Dippel; Theodora A M Siepman; Marcel L Dijkshoorn; Hervé L J Tanghe; Aad van der Lugt Journal: J Neurol Date: 2008-02-18 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: M Anzidei; A Napoli; D Geiger; B Cavallo Marincola; C Zini; F Zaccagna; P Di Paolo; C Catalano; R Passariello Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2010-02-22 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Joshua E Preiss; Dina S Itum; James G Reeves; Yazan Duwaryi; Ravi Rajani; Ravi Veeraswamy; Atef Salam; Thomas F Dodson; Luke P Brewster Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 2.192